I admire how Netflix and Paramount just tossed this out there right after announcing it during the Super Bowl. I can't say I found the actual movie terribly compelling, though. (I also didn't care for 10 Cloverfield Lane, though, either.)
The lead actress was appealing, but none of the rest of the cast were interesting. Stuff just...happens, without any logical reason and often in unexplained, almost supernatural ways.
The volume of cliches, jump scares, plot "twists," pseudoscience, and melodramatic musical cues got a bit silly after two hours. It felt an awful lot like someone trying to create an Event Horizon II without the stomach for violence.
I guess it looked pretty good for a movie made on a handful of sets with lots of solid space CG. But if we can't connect with the characters, we can't care what happens to them. And throwing in a lot of pointless conflict, especially the needless monologuing at the end, just wastes our time.
2/10 would not watch again.
Non riesci a trovare un film o una serie Tv? Accedi per crearlo.
Vuoi valutare o aggiungere quest'elemento a una lista?
Non sei un membro?
Risposta da cpheonix
il 6 febbraio, 2018 alle 6:18AM
It was entertaining but definitely the Cloverfield bits were shoehorned in and frankly, crap. The last scene in particular. And you could've take out everything on Earth with the husband. Seems like those scenes were only filmed to connect it to the franchise.
Life was better but this was watchable and the effects and cast were good. But this should've been a standalone film.
Risposta da chilone
il 6 febbraio, 2018 alle 3:23PM
Your opinion is somehow heading downward? ;) .... wait, maybe you meant "dissenting" lol. I liked it too. Kept me interested.
Risposta da Ask Me Anything
il 6 febbraio, 2018 alle 4:20PM
I knew that was the wrong word and I meant to go back and double check and forgot lol
Risposta da Horus Mazinga
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 12:50PM
I enjoyed it. I agree with many complaints (especially the shoe-horning) but was pleased with the movie overall. I thought the acting was fine other than the fact that whatshername can't seem to learn English but keeps getting roles in American films.
What I didn't like:
Other than these things, I was pretty satisfied. I even liked the end.
Would watch again. 7.5/10
Risposta da Jana
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:06PM
I would like to see both options in a near future. I know that Sean Parker with the backing of Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson among others, are involved in a project called "Screening Room" that is heavily opposed by James Cameron and Christopher Nolan. The project does not want to shut down movie theaters or make us forget the cinematic experience. Nothing can replace the sticky floors and the smell of popcorn.
But there is and always will be a percentage of people who can't make it there. And I'm one of them. I haven't been to a movie theater in almost ten years because of my arthritis. It's also for parents with young children, the elderly, for those who feel uncomfortable in crowds, or those who've had enough of cell phones and chatter etc.
If "Screening Room" falls through I hope some kind of deal can be done in the future so that Netflix or some other streaming service can offer theatrical releases within a month or so after the initial release. That way there's plenty of time for box office profits. This would be an on-demand service for a fee of course.
There are illegal sites using this technology and they are fast, new movies available the day after they premier. I must admit I have been using these sites sometimes since I can't go to the theater. If I just had the option to pay for it, I would. Movies is my passion.
Risposta da volkstraum
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 11:10PM
What was the 'threat' in this movie? The 'other dimension'??? Well I guess it seemed lethal at select moments but then faded away to non-existent, as if the filmakers couldn't afford any more effects or ran out of red-shirts to kill off. Terrible. Just terrible.
At least Life has a coherent story and a steady build-up in tension.
Risposta da write2topcat
il 8 febbraio, 2018 alle 1:50AM
Usually if you just unplug the particle accelerator for 30 seconds and then let it reboot, the earth will reappear.
Of course that would have made for a much shorter movie.
Risposta da Ask Me Anything
il 8 febbraio, 2018 alle 8:55PM
The threat was that the space station was being torn apart and they had to make it back to their universe before it was too late.
Life had a lot of dumb people doing dumb things, an invincible monster with no weaknesses so I knew everyone was doomed so why should I care about them, and a terrible heavy handed ending that insults your intelligence.
This movie has flaws but it did a pretty good job of getting me to care about the lead character. The way they gradually reveal what happened to her kids, realizes her alternate version's kids are still alive, wanting to go see them, then having to choose to stay with the station in order to save it. And that message she leaves for her alternate self was great. The only real dumb parts for me were Chris O'Dowd's death and the gyroscope being in the Russian guy's body, but I can at least write that off as parallel universe anomalies.
There is no excuse why a space station dealing with potentially deadly germs from Mars doesn't have a purge button.
Risposta da fan_of_films
il 9 febbraio, 2018 alle 10:03AM
This film does pay homage to Sam Raimi's Evil Dead. If you've seen Evil Dead you'll know what I mean! 😆
Risposta da Heather Santrous
il 11 febbraio, 2018 alle 2:52PM
You do realize that this film and the ending of the film does not take place on the Earth that we see in the original film? They didn't time travel. Perhaps you missed the explanation that the device they were trying to get to work could possibly open a paradox across time and dimensions. This film ties in closer to what we see happening in the second film, but there are some things that are different between the two as well. The monster at the end of this movie is not the same one we see in the original film because it is so much bigger. It does explain the monster in the first film, just not in the way you apparently think it does.
Risposta da Taylorfirst1
il 11 febbraio, 2018 alle 4:48PM
6/10
Risposta da D-magic
il 11 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:56PM
Not every severed arm in the movies is homage to Evil Dead. Maybe it was homage to Adams Family? Don't be ridiculous. As for what I think about this pile of garbage, well, it was simply embarrassing piece of crap. Solid 1/10.
Risposta da fan_of_films
il 12 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:07AM
Regarding comnents about the film as a "silly pointless mess"... I guess everyone knows it's a film industry so product has to be made to keep people employed. This is why pointless films get made. Films get made to keep people in work as much as they get made to chase profit. But yeah... this film was kinda pointless in terms of expanding the franchise! Not much link to Cloverfield.
Risposta da DRDMovieMusings
il 18 agosto, 2018 alle 9:07PM
It was not free. It's on Netflix.