Because of course, box office is always a good indicator of quality.

@JustinJackFlash said:

Because of course, box office is always a good indicator of quality.

Never said it was.

You were certainly implying it.

What about Mary Elizabeth Winstead? Love her.

@Halberstram said:

What about Mary Elizabeth Winstead? Love her.

I concur.

OP, you hated it that much? I was working on coming around to seeing it. After all, M.E.W. is in it...

I watched Final Destination 3 multiple times, and suffered through Mercy Street, just to get a glimpse of Mary Elizabeth Winstead's beautiful eyes!

Is the restraining order still in effect? :p

@JustinJackFlash said:

You were certainly implying it.

I implied no such thing, I simply pointed out the one thing about the movie that made me laugh.

@Gus Gorman said:

I implied no such thing, I simply pointed out the one thing about the movie that made me laugh.

Dude, sounds like someone's in denial. The aspect that made you laugh was the box office takings. Therefore you consider this to be important. If you didn't consider it to be important, it wouldn't have made you laugh. It would have been irrelevant to you. And you definitely wouldn't have started a thread stating it made you laugh.

You are strongly implying that Scott Pilgrim's much poorer box office performance than The Expendables is proof of it being a much more unworthy film. And what makes a film worthy or unworthy? Quality.

@JustinJackFlash said:

@Gus Gorman said:

I implied no such thing, I simply pointed out the one thing about the movie that made me laugh.

Dude, sounds like someone's in denial.

I've never been to Egypt.

And it suddenly all becomes clear why you didn't find Scott Pilgrim funny.

Would you two stop with your petty bickering and get back to Mary Elizabeth Winstead?

Hahaha

@JustinJackFlash said:

And it suddenly all becomes clear why you didn't find Scott Pilgrim funny.

Because it wasn't?