I agree with the critic sentiment. I haven't seen this, mostly because of those very same critics. Maybe I'll bump this up my queue.

Definitely worth the watch, it's a very ambitious retro style sci fi. Makes me think of the original trilogy of Star Wars

I've seen the movie - loved seeing the girl from Under The Dome again! I really enjoyed it. I never really care about what critics say... they're too critical. I just want to watch a movie that's fun, that I can enjoy. There doesn't have to be a dozen underlaying messages and hides layers -- I'd probably be too dumb for that anyway

True, the critics are too harsh on films. But this was a very fun film that was totally misunderstood and underrated.

I haven't seen all the movies that you listed, but of the ones I have, they were terrible. I think you just like bad movies.

better than star wars/trek for sure... the only issue i have with the movie is that it turns into a lecture in the last 20 minutes with various characters taking turns telling the audience how it is... apart from that it's actually a great movie...

critics are often wrong

@Star Lord said:

And look at the reviews for underrated films like pixels, x-men: apocalypse, warcraft: The beginning, ghostbusters (2016), The legend of Tarzan, Star Trek beyond, passengers, assassin's creed, etc.

I liked Tomorrowland and I agree it may be an underrated movie, but... pixels!? Really, man? Your nickname is Star Lord, which I assume makes you a fan of Guardians of the Galaxy, which gives you at least 5 positive points to your taste in movies. And you mention pixels!? Blargh! It's not just a bad movie, it's a bad movie with stupid Adam Sandler in it! As for the other "underrated movies" you refer to, I've only watched X-Men Apocalypse and Star Trek - I liked them both, not a lot, just as much as I demand from entertaining movies. But pixels!?

@Renovatio said:

better than star wars/trek for sure...

What do you mean better that Star Wars? Hope you are talking about episodes I or II, otherwise.. well, otherwise nothing, but come on.

the only issue i have with the movie is that it turns into a lecture in the last 20 minutes with various characters taking turns telling the audience how it is...

it does get boring right when Hugh Laurie starts explaining something about the machine, I didn't even pay attention to what he said.

@ana catarina fontes said:

@Renovatio said:

better than star wars/trek for sure...

What do you mean better that Star Wars? Hope you are talking about episodes I or II, otherwise.. well, otherwise nothing, but come on.

I find StarWars a bit, diluted and it seems the appeal nowadays is in connecting the various trivia within the series of movies and spin-offs rather than any singular film experience... I do remember watching the cool fighter plane sequences as a child (stayed with me), but that's about it as far as the impact any of the films had on me... Maybe I'm just all starred out...

Tomorrowland had a bit of that cinematic magic for a bit...

I liked Tomorrowland a lot. There are some really fun & excellent scenes in it. With an IMBD score of 6.4, Rotten Tomatoes score of 50% and 49% in my opinion it is very underrated. The last 15 minutes and the "preachy" ending might have turned some people off. I personally gave it a score of 8/10.