Yes, there's still plans to tweak the display. I have an open ticket for this here and hope to get to it within the next month or two.

974?!

What a giant list of priorities!!!

So.... Will it happen? I'm also curious about how much people need to rate a movie that it loses its status as "Not rated"... Can't find a description of that.

So.... Will it happen?

Eventually, but it is tied to a whole feature in this area and I have not found time to co-ordinate this with my designer. There's a lot of higher priority items right now.

I'm also curious about how much people needs to rate a movie that it loses its status as "Not rated".

You can read a bit about this here in the bible. Short version, the rating tool becomes available 7 days before the first primary release date.

@travisbell said:

So.... Will it happen?

Eventually, but it is tied to a whole feature in this area and I have not fond time to co-ordinate this with my designer. There's a lot of higher priority items right now.

I'm also curious about how much people needs to rate a movie that it loses its status as "Not rated".

You can read a bit about this here in the bible. Short version, the rating tool becomes available 7 days before the first primary release date.

Travis, how much big is your staff team right now?

It's like I've said months ago: you alone can not do all of this. You had to resurrect 10 times to do it!!!

Hey, Harry, cut Travis some slack. He's got only one designer, and they're very busy. Every minute he's responding to complaints that are getting old is another minute that he's not getting anything done.

@pt100 said:

Hey, Harry, cut Travis some slack. He's got only one designer, and they're very busy. Every minute he's responding to complaints that are getting old is another minute that he's not getting anything done.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I praised Travis in this thread and plenty of times and that's what I'm saying: his team is EXTREMELY SMALL and he can't do it alone.

JESUS CHRIST!!! Do people even read what the others say???

Heh, it's ok @Harry Skywalker, easy now

Still only a staff of one, but there's some cool things in the works that might allow us to generate some revenue which will in turn allow me to hire. We will see!

@Harry Skywalker said:

@pt100 said:

Hey, Harry, cut Travis some slack. He's got only one designer, and they're very busy. Every minute he's responding to complaints that are getting old is another minute that he's not getting anything done.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I praised Travis in this thread and plenty of times and that's what I'm saying: his team is EXTREMELY SMALL and he can't do it alone.

JESUS CHRIST!!! Do people even read what the others say???

Yes, we do read what others say. Do you? PT100 is right. And by the way, you've just done it again: made Travis waste more time replying to your rant.

And swearing won't do anything for your case. If you're not careful, you'll find yourself in violation of the Terms of Service.

@Harry Skywalker said:

JESUS CHRIST!!! Do people even read what the others say???

If we compare the number of likes for PT100's comment vs. yours, I think that tells the story. Enough said?

@SixtiesHoldout said:

@Harry Skywalker said:

@pt100 said:

Hey, Harry, cut Travis some slack. He's got only one designer, and they're very busy. Every minute he's responding to complaints that are getting old is another minute that he's not getting anything done.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I praised Travis in this thread and plenty of times and that's what I'm saying: his team is EXTREMELY SMALL and he can't do it alone.

JESUS CHRIST!!! Do people even read what the others say???

Yes, we do read what others say. Do you? PT100 is right. And by the way, you've just done it again: made Travis waste more time replying to your rant.

And swearing won't do anything for your case. If you're not careful, you'll find yourself in violation of the Terms of Service.

Np, PT100 and you are totally wrong and you, Mr. Jesus Christ, do have reading comprehension problems as well.

Swearing? Where did I swear? Surely you're just a troll.

@ZurichGnome said:

@Harry Skywalker said:

JESUS CHRIST!!! Do people even read what the others say???

If we compare the number of likes for PT100's comment vs. yours, I think that tells the story. Enough said?

I think it tells that you can't read as well and that you're desperately trying to convince PT100 to be your friend. Laughable.

By the way: my first comment is the one with most likes. But are you a little kid who uses the number of LIKES as argument?

@Harry Skywalker said:

By the way: my first comment is the one with most likes. But are you a little kid who uses the number of LIKES as argument?

I think most folks would regard the number of likes as a fair gauge of user sentiment. That's why the Like button is there. (Duh!)

I don't think Zurich Gnome was referring to your OP, but instead to your later post(s) wasting Travis's time. You know, the ones where you are the only person signifying liking them. (That little trick didn't work, because we can see your name as the only one on the liking list.)

@pt100 said:

@Harry Skywalker said:

By the way: my first comment is the one with most likes. But are you a little kid who uses the number of LIKES as argument?

I think most folks would regard the number of likes as a fair gauge of user sentiment. That's why the Like button is there. (Duh!)

I don't think Zurich Gnome was referring to your OP, but instead to your later post(s) wasting Travis's time. You know, the ones where you are the only person signifying liking them. (That little trick didn't work, because we can see your name as the only one on the liking list.)

Wrong again.

YOU are the one who's wasti9ng our time because you caused a flame war in a thread where I was actually praising Tavis.

YOU are the one who's wasting Travis and everyone's else time.

I liked all of my comments after my last talking to the other guy as a joke since he loves the number of likes so much. I know very well all names of the users who put likes appear them, so nice try.

I have the highest number of likes. You are wasting our precious time.

@pt100 said:

@Harry Skywalker said:

By the way: my first comment is the one with most likes. But are you a little kid who uses the number of LIKES as argument?

I think most folks would regard the number of likes as a fair gauge of user sentiment. That's why the Like button is there. (Duh!)

I don't think Zurich Gnome was referring to your OP, but instead to your later post(s) wasting Travis's time. You know, the ones where you are the only person signifying liking them. (That little trick didn't work, because we can see your name as the only one on the liking list.)

Wrong again.

YOU are the one who's wasti9ng our time because you caused a flame war in a thread where I was actually praising Tavis.

YOU are the one who's wasting Travis and everyone's else time.

I liked all of my comments after my last talking to the other guy as a joke since he loves the number of likes so much. I know very well all names of the users who put likes appear them, so nice try.

I have the highest number of likes. You are wasting our precious time.