Discuss Return to Sleepaway Camp
Discuss → Movies → Return to Sleepaway Camp → General
Ignoring the other sequels
posted by tmdb43737777STAFFMOD on June 23, 2017 at 9:39 PM
Was it a wise choice? While three was a low point. I think two was a nice entry and ignoring those sequels never answers when she got the operation, what she was up for two decades and much needed character development.
Reply by stugood
on August 5, 2017 at 3:33 AM
Is this one even any good?
Reply by tmdb43737777
on August 5, 2017 at 6:54 AM
It depends on what you like. The biggest flaw for me was Alan. But I liked it.
Reply by Howard Burns
on August 5, 2017 at 9:05 AM
I figured the sequels would be ignored since the original director had nothing to do with them, but yeah, I'd hoped there would be more to what happened after part one.
Admittedly I enjoyed "Return" to a degree when I first saw it years ago but after a rewatch, I realize it's just a bad attempt to recapture the feel of the original and it didn't help that Alan was such an unsympathetic douche. The 3rd movie was bad but often times hilarious because of it. This one just tried too hard with everything and it felt lazy, aside from a couple of pretty cool kills.