SPOILER SPOILER
What's with the logic of Curtis? He knew that by releasing the senator he was jeopardising the girls life - but I guess he just wanted it to be over and go and have a lie-down !!
Es fehlt ein Film oder eine Serie? Logge dich ein zum Ergänzen.
Diesen Eintrag bewerten oder zu einer Liste hinzufügen?
Kein Mitglied?
Antwort von FormerlyKnownAs
am 27. Januar 2019 um 12:45
David was the only “Innocent” in all of this. Everyone else (including Amy) is in this mess by their own, deliberate, actions. Also, Curt has a very strong let-right-be-done streak; plus, his line of work shows that he is kindhearted and has empathy toward others.
I think that Curt let David go because “by any means necessary” just isn’t a part of his makeup when it comes to someone who has done no wrong and who is where he is through no fault of his own.
I think Frank also would have let him go--the difference being, he would have made good-use of him first.
Antwort von Strange Bedfellows
am 27. Januar 2019 um 13:33
I didn't mind Curtis letting the senator go - my point was that he knew by doing so he was risking the girls life - he could have least have waited for Frank to come back before making a unilateral decision. He knew Frank had no intention of killing the senator.