讨论 新星空奇遇記

Picard is, once again, presented with a win-win situation: Get rid of Wesley and gain some knowledge for the federation. Naturally, he turns it down and spends lots of effort to have Wesley and some other tykes returned while rejecting any new knowledge.

This wasn't as painful as I remember, but it wasn't exactly a classic. I do appreciate the environmental message that was added. Many regard such messages in Star Trek with scorn, but it really is important to be reminded of these issues. I just wish that the episode itself was a little better.

Some thoughts:

"Humans are unusually attached to their offspring." This is a necessary survival feature. Since it takes soooo long for a human to develop and be able to feasibly survive on one's own, it is imperative that a parent have a strong attachment to an offspring. Do Klingons have a strong attachment to their offspring? How about Romulans? This isn't covered very thoroughly in Star Trek as far as I know.

In the future, children will be learning calculus at about the age most of us were fighting with long division. I kind of hope this turns out to be true.

3 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

@sukhisoo said:

In the future, children will be learning calculus at about the age most of us were fighting with long division. I kind of hope this turns out to be true.

Experience seems to suggest that people will actually learn/know less and less - except about stuff like "Gender Studies" - and will simply rely on more advanced gadgets to do things for them.

@Knixon said:

@sukhisoo said:

In the future, children will be learning calculus at about the age most of us were fighting with long division. I kind of hope this turns out to be true.

Experience seems to suggest that people will actually learn/know less and less - except about stuff like "Gender Studies" - and will simply rely on more advanced gadgets to do things for them.

Knixon your reply genuinely made me lol, thanks. So, not only "Gender Studies" (actually lots of things that end in the word "Studies") but "Critical Theory" and other marxist/leftist crap. But you're right, we're actually getting stupider on the whole. The gadgets are getting better but the information we can retrieve on them is being censored/edited/revised by aforementioned marxist/leftist idiots cough Zuckerberg cough

The information IS available, if people relied less on the gadgets.

But it could easily lead to "Idiocracy." Problem is, even that relies on a certain number of people who are actually smart, to keep things going. And often having to pretend they're NOT smart, in order to protect themselves. I don't know if I would have been so willing to serve that purpose even when I was younger, and I certainly couldn't be bothered now.

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区