What the hell was his end game? That made no sense. He went from the most cunning guy on the show with a lust for power, to a guy that wanted to die slowly in his Roman Bath. Lame.
¿No encuentras una película o serie? Inicia sesión para crearla:
¿Quieres puntuar o añadir este elemento a una lista?
¿No eres miembro?
Contestado por TheShredder
el 5 de junio de 2017 a las 14:17
I never understood that character. Was he evil, was he kind? Was he manipulating people, was he just trying to understand people? I never understood his motivation, nor agenda. But I liked the character. I imagine that the real Eckbert was more of a tyrant, considering the time and era, and what I know from history. This Eckbert seemed very progressive, almost 21st Century.
Contestado por Urban Commando
el 7 de junio de 2017 a las 04:41
Total agree. I liked the character too. That's why I'm disappointed in his demise.
Contestado por SevenHouses
el 7 de junio de 2017 a las 13:51
I kind of fell asleep during the last episodes so I will forever remember the chemistry between Ragnar (sigh) and Ecbert.
Contestado por Urban Commando
el 8 de junio de 2017 a las 01:53
The two chilling in the Roman Bath saying they are good men but corrupt men was one of the best scenes in the whole series.
Contestado por SevenHouses
el 8 de junio de 2017 a las 02:54
I totally agree!
Contestado por SevenHouses
el 8 de junio de 2017 a las 07:41
I think you're right. (I would have to watch some seasons again..) But Ecbert and Ragnar did bathe together. I think I liked that scene too, hehe.
Contestado por SevenHouses
el 8 de junio de 2017 a las 08:10
Can't get enough of them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DtH0mE5fzU
I always did like the ambiguity in Vikings. Many things were up for more than one interpretation.
Contestado por Urban Commando
el 9 de junio de 2017 a las 02:29
I guess I got those two scenes mixed up.
Contestado por His Excellency
el 8 de diciembre de 2017 a las 14:41
xxpo?
Contestado por His Excellency
el 8 de diciembre de 2017 a las 16:44
[Clap]