讨论 Gunsmoke

This relatively early episode was strange, because it depicts Dillon, shortly after killing three men in self-defense, in psychological torment, reflecting on all the men he's killed over the years. It actually causes him to resign.

Perhaps the strangest thing is the ending. Chester convinces Dillon to put his gun belt on again because Chester admits he's not up to the task and only Dillon can face the gunfighter. But after Dillon rearms himself, we just see him ride off to face the gunfighter; we never actually see how the action is resolved.

5 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

Well, since Matt was still alive, there could be only one of two results:

  1. Matt had to kill the gunfighter.
  2. Gunfighter taken into custody.

Unless someone else in town took care of him before Matt and Chester got back to town.

The point is that this is perhaps the only episode that does not explicitly resolve the situation clearly. I wonder if they received criticism for that, and never did it again. (I.e., the production code tends to require clear justice for the criminal.)

Maybe they just felt there was no need to show the results this one time. Since the series kept going with Dillon as the main character, we know the gunman has been dealt with in some way. Fatally or not.

@Moon_Doggie said:

The point is that this is perhaps the only episode that does not explicitly resolve the situation clearly. I wonder if they received criticism for that, and never did it again. (I.e., the production code tends to require clear justice for the criminal.)

**** WARNING: SPOILERS ****

Later on there was another episode (season 4, episode 26, "The Coward") in which Matt is feeling jumpy, which causes him to accidentally shoot and kill an innocent man. At first I was puzzled that this episode survived the production code guys. But I guess there was some sort of justice because the meddler that caused Dillon to get jumpy was forced to wander the West for the rest of his life w/the label of "coward" on him for twice attempting to goad someone else into trying to kill Dillon instead of doing it himself.

It still bothered me because, after all, Dillon did kill a completely innocent man and suffered no legal consequences at all. It just seemed strange and troubling that there wasn't even an inquest.

@pt100 said:

@Moon_Doggie said:

The point is that this is perhaps the only episode that does not explicitly resolve the situation clearly. I wonder if they received criticism for that, and never did it again. (I.e., the production code tends to require clear justice for the criminal.)

**** WARNING: SPOILERS ****

Later on there was another episode (season 4, episode 26, "The Coward") in which Matt is feeling jumpy, which causes him to accidentally shoot and kill an innocent man. At first I was puzzled that this episode survived the production code guys. But I guess there was some sort of justice because the meddler that caused Dillon to get jumpy was forced to wander the West for the rest of his life w/the label of "coward" on him for twice attempting to goad someone else into trying to kill Dillon instead of doing it himself.

It still bothered me because, after all, Dillon did kill a completely innocent man and suffered no legal consequences at all. It just seemed strange and troubling that there wasn't even an inquest.

Now that you mention it, I do recall this episode, and it was unsettling to me also. There were several where the plot resolution seemed unsatisfying, but this one had perhaps the weirdest outcome.

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区