Diskutuj o The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

In the last couple episodes, several points are made about Arthur having the question to the ultimate answer in his head, since he was part of the last generations of people on Earth. But so was Trillian. So why no discussion of dissecting HER brain?

Other than the obvious of course: she's hot, and Arthur isn't.

7 odpoveďí (na strane 1 z 1)

Jump to last post

If I recall correctly, her brain isn't "fresh enough." She left Earth six months before Arthur so her data is "incomplete."

I guess, if that's in the book; been too long since I read it. Not sure that really holds up though, considering it would presumably be genetic and Arthur's genetics hadn't changed since he was born. Neither had Trillian's.

@Knixon said:

I guess, if that's in the book; been too long since I read it. Not sure that really holds up though, considering it would presumably be genetic and Arthur's genetics hadn't changed since he was born. Neither had Trillian's.



While DNA sequence in the genome stays the same as the biological organism ages, there is a continuous process of damage, repair, mutations and recombinations.

The data - memory formed and stored probably via DNA methylation - about Earth at that critical point in time, in Arthur's brain, is more recent (up to date) than that of Trillian.

So, Frankie and Benjy (Lunkwill and Fook) were interested in buying Arthur's brain, because Arthur was on Earth right before it went ka-blooey and his brain may hold the Ultimate Question that the computer was trying to find out.

Actually, Trillian's brain is never mentioned in the book. I forget where I heard she was unacceptable. Trillian was an option in the radio show, but not in any subsequent versions. I suspect Douglas Adams left her out to focus the story back to Arthur.

My overall point about all of this, though, is that apparently the Ultimate Question - even if they had gotten it right - was pointless.

"What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" was obviously pointless.

But the CORRECT question (to get 42), "What do you get if you multiply six by seven?" is also pointless.

The pointlessness is the point.

@Knixon said:

My overall point about all of this, though, is that apparently the Ultimate Question - even if they had gotten it right - was pointless.

"What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" was obviously pointless.

But the CORRECT question (to get 42), "What do you get if you multiply six by seven?" is also pointless.



Frankie: "No, no, too literal, too factual, wouldn’t sustain the punters’ interest."

Nemôžeš nájsť film alebo seriál? Prihlás sa a pridaj ho.

Globálne

s zamerať sa na vyhľadávací riadok
p otvoriť menu profilu
esc zatvoriť otvorené okno
? otvoriť okno klávesových skratiek

Na média stránkach

b ísť späť (do rodičovského pokiaľ možno)
e íst na stránku úprav

Na stránkach seriálových serií

(pravá šípka) ísť na nasledujúcu sériu
(ľavá šípka) ísť na predchádzajúcu sériu

Na stránkach seriálových epizód

(pravá šípka) ísť na nasledujúcu epizódu
(ľavá šipka) isť na predchádzajúcu epizódu

Na všetkých obrázkových strankach

a otvoriť okno pre pridanie obrázku

Na všetkých stránkach úprav

t otvoriť výber prekladu
ctrl+ s odoslať formulár

Na stránkach diskusií

n vytvoriť novú diskusiu
w prepínač stavu pozerania
p prepínač verejný/súkromný
c prepínač zatvorený/otvorený
a otvoriť aktivitu
r odpovedať v diskusií
l ísť na poslednú odpoveď
ctrl+ enter odoslať vašu správu
(pravá šípka) nasledujúca strana
(ľavá šípka) predchádzajúca strana

Nastavenia

Chcete ohodnotiť alebo pridať túto položku do zoznamu?

Prihlásiť sa