Not a fan of the new rating system either. Previous star button style was quick and clean, inherent to TMDB, and a much better option for me personally. Please don't go IMDb route and force down changes no one asked. At least there should be an option for previous style. Thanks!
I can't even use it with Firefox Desktop but it work with Firefox on Android. The page simply turns black and white without the rating system appearing. And yes, I disabled every addon.
It would be more convenient to have smaller increments, such as 1%, rather than the current 10% steps. Additionally, instead of using emojis, consider offering a straightforward choice between these three options after the rating: "Thumbs up", "Thumbs down", or "Neutral".
I can't even use it with Firefox Desktop but it work with Firefox on Android. The page simply turns black and white without the rating system appearing. And yes, I disabled every addon.
I am not seeing any issues on Firefox (desktop or mobile). What OS are you on?
Is this intentional or have I misunderstood what these changes are ?
Hey @dokuro, tones are a new type of keyword. We have created a new section in the bible about this. Feel free to suggest some tweaks if that doesn't quite explain what they are well enough.
Sure, I get that and I've seen the bible entry. I was just surprised to see the tones users selected appearing under the changes is all. Would have thought this would be anonymous like user ratings.
The other new thing I don't like is labeling the rating system. Adding these arbitrary labels feels patronizing and unnecessary. Everybody has their personal, highly subjective criteria or system for that. For me, rating something "5" means the movie is average but also good, not just "passable". Most movies these days are average at best. That doesn't necessarily mean they're "not good", as the new rating system implies.
Another thing I noticed: by default, the new label system marks every movie as a "dumpster fire" with the rating slider set at "0". Why is that necessary?
Another thing I noticed: by default, the new label system marks every movie as a "dumpster fire" with the rating slider set at "0". Why is that necessary?
Because whoever decided to create this 'new' system is a 12-year-old? 😏
Etkö löydä elokuvaa tai TV-ohjelmaa? Kirjaudu sisään lisätäksesi se.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Snuffdadd
17 maaliskuu 2024 klo 9:46AM
Not a fan of the new rating system either. Previous star button style was quick and clean, inherent to TMDB, and a much better option for me personally. Please don't go IMDb route and force down changes no one asked. At least there should be an option for previous style. Thanks!
Vastaus käyttäjältä Rhakon
17 maaliskuu 2024 klo 2:07PM
I can't even use it with Firefox Desktop but it work with Firefox on Android. The page simply turns black and white without the rating system appearing. And yes, I disabled every addon.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Rhyzak
17 maaliskuu 2024 klo 2:47PM
It would be more convenient to have smaller increments, such as 1%, rather than the current 10% steps. Additionally, instead of using emojis, consider offering a straightforward choice between these three options after the rating: "Thumbs up", "Thumbs down", or "Neutral".
Vastaus käyttäjältä Travis Bell
17 maaliskuu 2024 klo 4:32PM
I am not seeing any issues on Firefox (desktop or mobile). What OS are you on?
Our rating system has been "10 steps" (ie. 10% -- (0.5/5 and 1/10)) for the last ~8 years. There is not currently any plans to change this.
Vastaus käyttäjältä dokuro
18 maaliskuu 2024 klo 4:34AM
I could be wrong but it appears users tones are coming up in the changes. See https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/634492-madame-web/changes?filter_key=key&filter=plot_keywords as an example.
Is this intentional or have I misunderstood what these changes are ?
Vastaus käyttäjältä Travis Bell
18 maaliskuu 2024 klo 10:59AM
Hey @dokuro, tones are a new type of keyword. We have created a new section in the bible about this. Feel free to suggest some tweaks if that doesn't quite explain what they are well enough.
Vastaus käyttäjältä dokuro
18 maaliskuu 2024 klo 11:03AM
Sure, I get that and I've seen the bible entry. I was just surprised to see the tones users selected appearing under the changes is all. Would have thought this would be anonymous like user ratings.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Travis Bell
18 maaliskuu 2024 klo 11:13AM
They are not user data though, they are base metadata like regular keywords.
Vastaus käyttäjältä dokuro
18 maaliskuu 2024 klo 11:18AM
Okay, my misunderstanding. Thank you.
Vastaus käyttäjältä genplant29
18 maaliskuu 2024 klo 3:50PM
Btw, selecting tone emoji(s) and Vibe word(s) is not mandatory; we all still can simply numerically rate a movie or show, and leave things at that.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Rhakon
19 maaliskuu 2024 klo 9:33AM
Windows 11 (10.0.22631 Build 22631).
Edit: Not sure what fixed it but it's working now.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Snuffdadd
3 toukokuu 2024 klo 8:52PM
The other new thing I don't like is labeling the rating system. Adding these arbitrary labels feels patronizing and unnecessary. Everybody has their personal, highly subjective criteria or system for that. For me, rating something "5" means the movie is average but also good, not just "passable". Most movies these days are average at best. That doesn't necessarily mean they're "not good", as the new rating system implies.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Snuffdadd
25 toukokuu 2024 klo 8:03PM
Another thing I noticed: by default, the new label system marks every movie as a "dumpster fire" with the rating slider set at "0". Why is that necessary?
Vastaus käyttäjältä bratface
25 toukokuu 2024 klo 10:53PM
Because whoever decided to create this 'new' system is a 12-year-old? 😏