The Movie Database 支持

Initially I had made this comment in this thread https://www.themoviedb.org/tv/1855-star-trek-voyager/discuss/629bbd157ad08c4e66ae3bbb but think its probably best to open this up to a wider discussion.

@superboy97 said:

This newspaper page also confirm that there was one single episode broadcasted on that day.

I'd like to question and voice my objection to these changes and the other changes being reported for various star trek spin offs.

It seems that certain folks are reporting what they consider issues so they can match the running order based on the DVD order of the show. The use of news articles written by journalist who have no affiliation to the show or the tv network airing the initially broadcast is flawed. As journalist writing the article its just THEIR opinion its a single episode. Its my opinion and many others that they are two episodes which aired after each other. The episodes have different production codes and the fact they aired after each other should IMO take precedence over news articles.

I would also suggest at this point the bible be updated to state something along these lines that if multi-part episodes are aired BACK to BACK that TMDB consider these a single episode. This is what is happening with various other edits recently (see friends as an example) and I suggest TMDB just make this a rule and be done with it if that is the direction TMDB wants to go.

2 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

It seems that you didn't look at the newspaper page.

This is not a news article written by a journalist, but the TV schedule. When 2 episodes air back to back, there are 2 separate entries in the TV schedule

And, even if its not an official source, Wikipedia indicate "It was originally shown May 23, 2001, on the UPN network as a double-length episode and later presented as such in DVD collections, but it is shown in syndicated broadcasts as a two-part story. ". Furthermore, this episode has one single production code.

Concerning the Friends edits, they were done based on archives of the official site, not based on news articles.

I sense it'll be an endless debate so I'll just accept the way its going to be.

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区