The Movie Database 지원

A lot of collections seemed to have disappeared lately. I suppose this is due to the site administrator's extremely stringent and inflexible rules on what constitutes a collection. This sort of thing always happens when people start trying to outsmart common sense. It's too bad -- collections were one of the best features of TMDB.

18 댓글 (2 / 2)

Jump to last post

이전 페이지

I was surprised to see these changes lately again too when collectios started to diseppear from my Kodi library. While many of these changes are fine there are some that are surprising to me. For example I don't exactly understand why the Eastrail 177 trilogy is not considered as a collection anymore since it fits this: "As a general rule, a sequel is a film which centers around the same main characters and continues the story of an earlier film. The protagonists evolve and are aware o the events that happened in the earlier films."? While they are not numbered and the second movie, Split, is very much a stand alone part they still tie together quite strongly and the last part, Glass, is in my opinion a clear sequel to both Unbreakable and Split. They have the same characters, same actors, same timeline, same backstory, same writer and same director and the characters even remeber the past events (Split obviously has only the new Beast character except for the end so there isn't any past events to present but the story of Glass really does not make sense without it or Unbreakable). For Cloverfield I understand the following because they have no relation except for the name: "For example, the "Eastrail 177" trilogy and the Cloverfield films do not belong in a collection.".

Glass, is in my opinion a clear sequel to both Unbreakable and Split.

Yes, exactly. So, should we create a collection with Unbreakable and Glass or one with Split and Glass. We can't have both collections, or one with all three movies. That's the dilemma and the official reason why this proposed collection is not a fit with the current collection rules.

@lineker said:

Glass, is in my opinion a clear sequel to both Unbreakable and Split.

Yes, exactly. So, should we create a collection with Unbreakable and Glass or one with Split and Glass. We can't have both collections, or one with all three movies. That's the dilemma and the official reason why this proposed collection is not a fit with the current collection rules.

I feel that in this case the rules are too strict and these three should be part of a collection as even the creators themselves have said that they are a trilogy. ProjectVRD has explained why much better over here: https://www.themoviedb.org/talk/5e2247a9397df000169989d2

찾으시는 영화나 TV 프로그램이 없나요? 로그인 하셔서 직접 만들어주세요.

전체

s 검색 바 띄우기
p 프로필 메뉴 열기
esc 열린 창 닫기
? 키보드 단축키 창 열기

미디어 페이지

b 돌아가기
e 편집 페이지로 이동

TV 시즌 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 시즌으로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 시즌으로 가기

TV 에피소드 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 에피소드로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 에피소드로 가기

모든 이미지 페이지

a 이미지 추가 창 열기

모든 편집 페이지

t 번역 선택 열기
ctrl+ s 항목 저장

토론 페이지

n 새 토론 만들기
w 보기 상태
p 공개/비공개 전환
c 열기/닫기 전환
a 활동 열기
r 댓글에 글쓰기
l 마지막 댓글로 가기
ctrl+ enter 회원님의 메세지 제출
(우 화살표) 다음 페이지
(좌 화살표) 이전 페이지

설정

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

로그인