We'd like to be able to show the breakdown of male vs female in many areas, such as being able to generate most-watched Actors and Actresses automatically based on film views (instead of just a single list of Actors). A gender field on the person object would make this possible and is preferable to us layering this on at our end (and presumably then crowd-sourcing the data from our members).
Non riesci a trovare un film o una serie Tv? Accedi per crearlo.
Vuoi valutare o aggiungere quest'elemento a una lista?
Non sei un membro?
Risposta da Travis Bell
il 28 gennaio, 2016 alle 6:00PM
Hey Matthew,
Yup, this one is being tracked as well (ticket #434). This one is easier and probably something I could get done sooner rather than later.
Risposta da matthewbuchanan
il 28 gennaio, 2016 alle 7:57PM
Cool, thanks. With all the interest in Women in Film, seems like something that would be well received!
Risposta da Travis Bell
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 5:17PM
Genders has been pushed live on the website. This will make its way to the API in a few days.
Risposta da matthewbuchanan
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 5:34PM
Awesome! Thanks very much.
Risposta da matthewbuchanan
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 5:35PM
Might it be worth having an "Other" option instead of just Male/Female/unset?
Risposta da Marr 🇳🇱
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 5:39PM
I just noticed the new people profiles, neat! :)
Risposta da Travis Bell
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 5:52PM
Curious, is there really a difference between "other" and "unspecified"? What I mean specifically I guess is the "-" is just a label, which I could change. So what I am wondering is, is the idea of an "other" or "not specified" gender any different? Those feel the same to me. If a person doesn't want to share a specific gender then that's fine but we would still only need 3 options. Thoughts, ideas?
Risposta da matthewbuchanan
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 5:55PM
Yes, on reflection that makes sense. At least you are offering the third option! If the field had to mandatorily be Male or Female that might present more of a problem.
Risposta da matthewbuchanan
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 5:56PM
The only downside is that it's not possible to tell the difference between "this field is not set" and "this field is purposefully set to unspecified".
Risposta da Samara
il 8 febbraio, 2016 alle 8:05PM
Just a reminder: Maybe think of to make a field for relatives like suggested before