The generally accepted standard for collections are the films must be sequels. In my opinion this is not a valid collection according to the guidelines. Also this "collection" of films is accessible using other criteria.

I would say this is not a valid collection. It would however make a perfect list and I encourage you to create it.

Hi, how you say, according the sequel standard rules, Nicholas Sparks is not valid collection in 2012. Today i do a little research, he have a brand under your name. In fact he have 11 movies + 1 TV film adaptation of his novels with great success. Since 11 Sparks movies comes under the same brand in this case, "Nicholas Sparks" it can be a real collection. I leave my comment in the table, just for your consideration. I already have the arts :)

Regards.

Hello,

Please read our collection guidelines - as it was back in 2012, collections are for true sequels only. The adaptations of Nicholas Sparks' works would not quality, unless one is a true sequel of another.

@rfl0216 said:

Hello,

Please read our collection guidelines - as it was back in 2012, collections are for true sequels only. The adaptations of Nicholas Sparks' works would not quality, unless one is a true sequel of another.

Thank you for your kindness Rebecca.

Regards