Collection, or no? Two editors disagree: http://www.themoviedb.org/collection/123898-nicholas-sparks-collection/changes
I quite liked having the Sparks Collection in my library, but I'll only add it back if it fits the generally accepted standard. Weigh in?
¿No encuentras una película o serie? Inicia sesión para crearla:
¿Quieres puntuar o añadir este elemento a una lista?
¿No eres miembro?
Contestado por endtheme
el 29 de diciembre de 2012 a las 20:11
The generally accepted standard for collections are the films must be sequels. In my opinion this is not a valid collection according to the guidelines. Also this "collection" of films is accessible using other criteria.
Contestado por Travis Bell
el 31 de diciembre de 2012 a las 11:12
I would say this is not a valid collection. It would however make a perfect list and I encourage you to create it.
Contestado por Riggs
el 14 de mayo de 2018 a las 11:04
Hi, how you say, according the sequel standard rules, Nicholas Sparks is not valid collection in 2012. Today i do a little research, he have a brand under your name. In fact he have 11 movies + 1 TV film adaptation of his novels with great success. Since 11 Sparks movies comes under the same brand in this case, "Nicholas Sparks" it can be a real collection. I leave my comment in the table, just for your consideration. I already have the arts :)
Regards.
Contestado por Rebecca
el 14 de mayo de 2018 a las 11:17
Hello,
Please read our collection guidelines - as it was back in 2012, collections are for true sequels only. The adaptations of Nicholas Sparks' works would not quality, unless one is a true sequel of another.
Contestado por Riggs
el 14 de mayo de 2018 a las 11:31
Thank you for your kindness Rebecca.
Regards