Collection, or no? Two editors disagree: http://www.themoviedb.org/collection/123898-nicholas-sparks-collection/changes
I quite liked having the Sparks Collection in my library, but I'll only add it back if it fits the generally accepted standard. Weigh in?
Es fehlt ein Film oder eine Serie? Logge dich ein zum Ergänzen.
Diesen Eintrag bewerten oder zu einer Liste hinzufügen?
Kein Mitglied?
Antwort von endtheme
am 29. Dezember 2012 um 20:11
The generally accepted standard for collections are the films must be sequels. In my opinion this is not a valid collection according to the guidelines. Also this "collection" of films is accessible using other criteria.
Antwort von Travis Bell
am 31. Dezember 2012 um 11:12
I would say this is not a valid collection. It would however make a perfect list and I encourage you to create it.
Antwort von Riggs
am 14. Mai 2018 um 11:04
Hi, how you say, according the sequel standard rules, Nicholas Sparks is not valid collection in 2012. Today i do a little research, he have a brand under your name. In fact he have 11 movies + 1 TV film adaptation of his novels with great success. Since 11 Sparks movies comes under the same brand in this case, "Nicholas Sparks" it can be a real collection. I leave my comment in the table, just for your consideration. I already have the arts :)
Regards.
Antwort von Rebecca
am 14. Mai 2018 um 11:17
Hello,
Please read our collection guidelines - as it was back in 2012, collections are for true sequels only. The adaptations of Nicholas Sparks' works would not quality, unless one is a true sequel of another.
Antwort von Riggs
am 14. Mai 2018 um 11:31
Thank you for your kindness Rebecca.
Regards