Bespreek Burt Reynolds

At one time in the 1970s he was the #1 box office draw, and highest paid actor, but the movies he chose to do are really just junk. You would think his agent could've found him one of those great movies from the '70s to star in, and not another one of those corruption in a small Southern town flicks, which seem to make up half of his peak career work.

4 antwoorde (op blad 1 van 1)

Jump to last post

yes he did..

Burt was the number 1 box office star for an unprecedented five straight years.

I think his agent did something right.

@DanDare said:

Burt was the number 1 box office star for an unprecedented five straight years.

I think his agent did something right.

The OP conceded that. His point was, box office notwithstanding, his body of work isn't of a quality commensurate with his talents.

Doing box office is one thing, a measure that does not make a movie or career good (Transformers, anyone?); doing good work that holds up over time is what seems missing from his body of work (and great movies don't always do killer box office). Somehow, sadly, he did not accept scripts that really showcased his acting chops in stories that were compelling.

Can we pin that on his agent? It'd be interesting to know what scripts he saw and rejected, or never got to see that he should have seen.

@DRDMovieMusings said:

@DanDare said:

Burt was the number 1 box office star for an unprecedented five straight years.

I think his agent did something right.

The OP conceded that. His point was, box office notwithstanding, his body of work isn't of a quality commensurate with his talents.

Doing box office is one thing, a measure that does not make a movie or career good (Transformers, anyone?); doing good work that holds up over time is what seems missing from his body of work (and great movies don't always do killer box office). Somehow, sadly, he did not accept scripts that really showcased his acting chops in stories that were compelling.

Can we pin that on his agent? It'd be interesting to know what scripts he saw and rejected, or never got to see that he should have seen.

We will end up with the Warren Beatty argument like how he was offered every major role in the 1970s and turned them all down. No one asks that every major actor is first choice for any film that is greenlit. Anyhow could you seriously take Warren Beatty as Superman?

In the case of Reynolds, he turned down James Bond presumably when Moore was offered the role. Would he had done it as an Englishman? Would he had been any good? He turned down Han Solo but hold on I thought it was Christopher Walken that was offered the Han Solo role first.

I am just waiting for Francis Coppola to confirm that Reynolds turned down Michael Corleone after Robert Redford his first choice also turned him down for The Godfather!

I think Reynolds was a very good actor. I think Reynolds himself alluded that he went for populist films and should had tried harder for more serious roles to stretch him. This presumably rules out Bond, Solo or even Superman.

Kan ’n rolprent of TV-program nie vind nie? Teken aan om dit te skep.

Globaal

s fokus op soekbalk
p open profielkieslys
esc sluit ’n oop venster
? open sneltoetsvenster

Op mediablaaie

b gaan terug (na ouer waar van toepassing)
e gaan na wysigblad

Op TV-seisoenblaaie

(regterpyl) gaan na volgende seisoen
(linkerpyl) gaan na vorige seisoen

Op TV-episodeblaaie

(regterpyl) gaan na volgende episode
(linkerpyl) gaan na vorige episode

Op alle beeldblaaie

a open beeldtoevoegvenster

Op alle wysigingsblaaie

t open vertaalkieser
ctrl+ s dien form in

Op besprekingsblaaie

n skep nuwe bespreking
w tokkel kykstatus
p tokkel openbaar/privaat
c tokkel maak oop/toe
a open aktiwiteit
r reageer op bespreking
l gaan na laaste reaksie
ctrl+ enter dien u boodskap in
(regterpyl) volgende blad
(linkerpyl) vorige blad

Instellings

Wil u hierdie item gradeer of tot ’n lys toevoeg?

Teken aan