Discuss The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift

I remember when this came out and the poster "ignored" the "stars" of the movie (Lucas Black and Lil Bow Wow..lol). Despite having some EPIC race scenes and being pure car porn, it felt like a cheap sequel and a series ender. Hard to believe they decided to go with a FOURTH and bring the stars back and is now a $5 billion dollar world wide franchise! Kudos to Universal, as an exec I woulda quit after part 3!

8 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

This franchise is box office gold, and, yep, this movie far underperformed.

Putting box office over budget, the ROI for each installment is as follows:

  • The Fast and the Furious paid $5.45
  • 2 Fast 2 Furious paid $3.11
  • The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift paid $1.86
  • Fast & Furious paid $4.27
  • Fast Five paid $5.01
  • Fast & Furious 6 paid $4.93
  • Furious 7 paid $7.97
  • The Fate of the Furious paid $4.96
  • F9 paid $1.28 (keeping in mind that's based on international box office only, it hasn't even released in USA yet!)

To put these numbers into better general perspective, in my Movie ROI database of over 1000 titles from 1926 to present:

  • the average ROI is $4.23
  • 75% of them paid $7 or lower
  • only 10% of them paid > $15

Comparing the installments to each other themselves, note that the first one was the highest paying (it is rare for sequels to outperform the franchise original in ROI)...until F7 which was an emotional tribute to Paul Walker and would naturally have been must-see for the franchise's fans; beyond the unfortunate circumstances that caused that ROI blip, this is a solid franchise that's paid a solid $4.46 thus far (again, including incomplete final numbers from F9). If we remove F9 and F3, the franchise paid $5.10, and if we also remove F7's emotional blip, it paid $4.62.

Any way you slice it, F3 is a pox on an otherwise splendid franchise box.

This is the only one of the franchise I've seen. I can't remember why I chose to watch at it the time though. I think was because there were a couple of actors I wanted to see & BONUS, no Diesel.

@bratface said:

This is the only one of the franchise I've seen. I can't remember why I chose to watch at it the time though. I think was because there were a couple of actors I wanted to see & BONUS, no Diesel.

Vin Diesel WAS in this film.

@GusGorman said:

@bratface said:

This is the only one of the franchise I've seen. I can't remember why I chose to watch at it the time though. I think was because there were a couple of actors I wanted to see & BONUS, no Diesel.

Vin Diesel WAS in this film.

I don't remember him though. But it's been years since I've seen it

@bratface said:

@GusGorman said:

@bratface said:

This is the only one of the franchise I've seen. I can't remember why I chose to watch at it the time though. I think was because there were a couple of actors I wanted to see & BONUS, no Diesel.

Vin Diesel WAS in this film.

I don't remember him though. But it's been years since I've seen it

https://youtu.be/s7IUngG-oWY

@acontributor said:

Vin Diesel's role in this was minor. It was just a cameo.

This movie wasn't American it was Japanese and had little to do with the franchise. It was more of a spinoff than a sequel. So it's no surprise that it under performed.

Hobbs and Shaw wasn't in the list. Don't forget that one.

Hobbs and Shaw paid $3.80 - not terrible, but still lagging the average for the F&F franchise as well as the average across my database...here in TMDb, it's been put into its own collection apart from F&F. A sequel is in the works, let's see if it gets a theatrical release in which case we'll have box office to compare apples to apples.

@Damienracer said:

@bratface said:

This is the only one of the franchise I've seen. I can't remember why I chose to watch at it the time though. I think was because there were a couple of actors I wanted to see & BONUS, no Diesel.

So let me get this absolutely straight so that there's no confusion here: you started to become a connoisseur of the fine art of acting when you skipped Vin Diesel in favour of Lil Bow Wow, some BTS wannabes straight out of MTV and Lucas Black, have I got that right?

No, because of Sung Kang. How hard do you try to be an asshole? Or does it come naturally?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMvk0KqS8aQ

@bratface said:

@Damienracer said:

@bratface said:

This is the only one of the franchise I've seen. I can't remember why I chose to watch at it the time though. I think was because there were a couple of actors I wanted to see & BONUS, no Diesel.

So let me get this absolutely straight so that there's no confusion here: you started to become a connoisseur of the fine art of acting when you skipped Vin Diesel in favour of Lil Bow Wow, some BTS wannabes straight out of MTV and Lucas Black, have I got that right?

No, because of Sung Kang. How hard do you try to be an asshole? Or does it come naturally?

I'm quite willing to bet that I was neither the first to put Damienracer on blocklist nor the last. Most of the people I've blocked have since either been suspended or had their account deleted altogether, so I'm confident it was the right move in this case as well.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login