Discuss Testigo en peligro

Great movie.. heart

Did John (Harrison Ford) and Rachel (Kelly McGillis) do the wild thing in the field? relaxed

11 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

I never thought they did until the last couple of times I watched it.

Same... The first time I watched it I thought not. But when you see they way they look at each other when he leaves at the end, I think so relaxed

What if she is pregnant?!😱😱😱 It worries me ...I don't think amish people use contraceptives.

@rominabe said:

What if she is pregnant?!😱😱😱 It worries me ...I don't think amish people use contraceptives.

She'd blame the pregnancy on Hochleitner... An old saying is the first child can come at any time, the second one takes nine months..

I think they did... as someone pointed out to me once, later when Rachel is serving the Amish men lemonade, being a good little woman, the first glass she pours is John's. At least, that's how I remember it... it's been such a long time since I've seen this film....

From what I recall, I definitely thought they did not. I also seem to recall Barry Norman saying on his film review tv programme that although he loved the film, he didn't like the fact that the relationship didn't develop.

@AAflix said:

From what I recall, I definitely thought they did not. I also seem to recall Barry Norman saying on his film review tv programme that although he loved the film, he didn't like the fact that the relationship didn't develop.

You make it sound like Barry Norman co-wrote the film or something.

You make it sound like Barry Norman co-wrote the film or something.

In those days in the UK, he was something like Roger Ebert became to the internet decades later. Whether or not anyone agreed with him, and like pretty-much everyone else on here I'm sure we make our own opinions about films we watch, his counted. And I remember thinking that part of what made the film unusual for me is that it didn't follow that track.

@AAflix said:

You make it sound like Barry Norman co-wrote the film or something.

In those days in the UK, he was something like Roger Ebert became to the internet decades later. Whether or not anyone agreed with him, and like pretty-much everyone else on here I'm sure we make our own opinions about films we watch, his counted. And I remember thinking that part of what made the film unusual for me is that it didn't follow that track.

Oh, I gotcha. When "At the Movies" was on, I was really big on Siskel and Ebert. I guess that my home schooling -- oops, I meant schooling didn't inform me about this Barry Norman guy.

I really felt John and Rachel did "do it," but that the film just skirts the issue. That is possible, you know.

I really felt John and Rachel did "do it," but that the film just skirts the issue. That is possible, you know.

Well if different interpretations weren't possible discussion wouldn't exist, so of course.

I agree....

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login