Chinatown 토론

I've seen Chinatown, but it didn't move me.

In terms of place and time, I much preferred L.A. Confidential, which, I think:

  • smashed the facade of Tinseltown to scratch its seething underbelly of corruption and violence
  • masterfully interwove real headlines and stories from the era (Bloody Christmas, the entire Mickey Cohen subplot, Lana Turner and Stompanato, etc.)
  • captured the nascence of tabloid media
  • balanced a powerhouse ensemble cast
  • followed the stories of these characters with pathos

As far as the film noir cues are concerned:

  • sympathetic characters died
  • some bad guys didn't
  • had its fair share of bleakness/despair
  • yet (in a hard break from pure noir) offered a somewhat hopeful ending.

For those of you who a) like/love Chinatown and b) have also seen L.A. Confidential, please share with me/us how you contrast/compare these two films. I've had to watch movies more than once to "get" what people love about them, and am quite willing to watch Chinatown again, armed with guidance for what to look for.

5 댓글 (1 / 1)

Jump to last post

I've only seen Chinatown once but I prefer L.A. Confidential. It was my favourite film for a long time. Not sure it's necessarily a better film than Chinatown, taking into account that L.A. Confidential was made much later and improvements were made in the genre. Like I enjoyed Chinatown more than The Maltese Falcon. But I don't think it's a better film.

I'm also a big James Ellroy fan. I've read many of his books. L.A. Confidential was the middle part of a trilogy and I so wish they'd adapt the other two.

@JustinJackFlash said:

I've only seen Chinatown once but I prefer L.A. Confidential. It was my favourite film for a long time. Not sure it's necessarily a better film than Chinatown, taking into account that L.A. Confidential was made much later and improvements were made in the genre. Like I enjoyed Chinatown more than The Maltese Falcon. But I don't think it's a better film.

Ah yes, The Maltese Falcon, another highly-regarded movie that I just didn't get - and it's not that I don't like "old" movies (Double Indemnity is an all-time favourite, and my favourite movie-maker is still Billy Wilder). But, I digress...

I'm also a big James Ellroy fan. I've read many of his books. L.A. Confidential was the middle part of a trilogy and I so wish they'd adapt the other two.

THANKS FOR THIS! I followed your lead here and found out that he actually wrote an "L.A. Quartet", and another title from that series was also made into a movie, The Black Dahlia, which is now on my list to see! If you check it out too, we can discuss it on The Black Dahlia's discussion board :-)

@DRDMovieMusings said:

@JustinJackFlash said:

I've only seen Chinatown once but I prefer L.A. Confidential. It was my favourite film for a long time. Not sure it's necessarily a better film than Chinatown, taking into account that L.A. Confidential was made much later and improvements were made in the genre. Like I enjoyed Chinatown more than The Maltese Falcon. But I don't think it's a better film.

Ah yes, The Maltese Falcon, another highly-regarded movie that I just didn't get - and it's not that I don't like "old" movies (Double Indemnity is an all-time favourite, and my favourite movie-maker is still Billy Wilder). But, I digress...

I'm also a big James Ellroy fan. I've read many of his books. L.A. Confidential was the middle part of a trilogy and I so wish they'd adapt the other two.

THANKS FOR THIS! I followed your lead here and found out that he actually wrote an "L.A. Quartet", and another title from that series was also made into a movie, The Black Dahlia, which is now on my list to see! If you check it out too, we can discuss it on The Black Dahlia's discussion board :-)

I've seen The Black Dahlia and I wouldn't get my hopes up for it as it's not very good. It makes a lot of changes from the book and so does L.A. Confidential. But whereas L.A. Confidential adapts the core spirit of the book into it's own story and becomes an excellent film, The Black Dahlia is just a silly but straightforward thriller with a couple of neat Brian DePalma touches.

I actually never understood why they call it an L.A. Quartet because The Black Dahlia has absolutely nothing to do with the other three other than being set in the same universe. But Ellroy has written a number of books set in that universe that aren't part of that quartet. The other three have recurring characters appearing in all of them and the narratives are connected. You don't need to read The Black Dahlia in order to follow the other three. So I always considered them a trilogy.

@JustinJackFlash said:

@DRDMovieMusings said:

THANKS FOR THIS! I followed your lead here and found out that he actually wrote an "L.A. Quartet", and another title from that series was also made into a movie, The Black Dahlia, which is now on my list to see! If you check it out too, we can discuss it on The Black Dahlia's discussion board :-)

I've seen The Black Dahlia and I wouldn't get my hopes up for it as it's not very good. It makes a lot of changes from the book and so does L.A. Confidential. But whereas L.A. Confidential adapts the core spirit of the book into it's own story and becomes an excellent film, The Black Dahlia is just a silly but straightforward thriller with a couple of neat Brian DePalma touches.

I hear you. What's (sadly) interesting is that James Ellroy's mother was murdered, and he identified with the tragedy of Elizabeth Short. Too bad the movie failed to capture the spirit better.

I actually never understood why they call it an L.A. Quartet because The Black Dahlia has absolutely nothing to do with the other three other than being set in the same universe. But Ellroy has written a number of books set in that universe that aren't part of that quartet. The other three have recurring characters appearing in all of them and the narratives are connected. You don't need to read The Black Dahlia in order to follow the other three. So I always considered them a trilogy.

I dig how you look at it!

@DRDMovieMusings said:

I hear you. What's (sadly) interesting is that James Ellroy's mother was murdered, and he identified with the tragedy of Elizabeth Short. Too bad the movie failed to capture the spirit better.

Yeah, you can really get the sense of that in his writing in the novel. It's very much about obsession. To the extent that it's very repetitive. There's a lot of endless descriptions of following tenuous leads that go nowhere. And that's very much the point of it. And that's hard to convey in a mainstream film.

찾으시는 영화나 TV 프로그램이 없나요? 로그인 하셔서 직접 만들어주세요.

전체

s 검색 바 띄우기
p 프로필 메뉴 열기
esc 열린 창 닫기
? 키보드 단축키 창 열기

미디어 페이지

b 돌아가기
e 편집 페이지로 이동

TV 시즌 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 시즌으로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 시즌으로 가기

TV 에피소드 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 에피소드로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 에피소드로 가기

모든 이미지 페이지

a 이미지 추가 창 열기

모든 편집 페이지

t 번역 선택 열기
ctrl+ s 항목 저장

토론 페이지

n 새 토론 만들기
w 보기 상태
p 공개/비공개 전환
c 열기/닫기 전환
a 활동 열기
r 댓글에 글쓰기
l 마지막 댓글로 가기
ctrl+ enter 회원님의 메세지 제출
(우 화살표) 다음 페이지
(좌 화살표) 이전 페이지

설정

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

로그인