So she says by the end the son couldn't even move anymore and then she performed euthanasia and got 15 years for it because she didn't speak at trial and husband testified against her, but what about other people, her parents, nobody would know the son was terminally ill, wouldn't autopsy show it? Seems quite unrealistic to come with such reveal to justify sure is actually nice person and not some horrible child killing monster. Can't imagine any judge giving mother 15y for performing euthanasia in last stage of terminal disease.