Item: Dream Scenario
Language: en-US
Type of Problem: Design_issue
Extra Details: Just a quick question about posters...
The 2000x3000 one seems to be the norm, although the 2000x2963 poster is also within the preferred 1:1.5/2:3 aspect ratio.
2000x3000 may seem like more, but it chops off parts of the left and right sides of the image. The 2000x2963 one has more image information. Is it an "acceptable loss" in terms of the 2000x3000 image? Just want to clarify, since several cropped posters have been kept, while images with more left/right details have been deleted. :)
2000x3000 - cropped: https://www.themoviedb.org/t/p/original/f7WwZV1aThZVFATy7hCYfJzMsu4.jpg
2000x2963 - uncropped: https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/kZiIWGEjaxupYQ7PwWMEAaIzCdJ.jpg
(Just compare them side-by-side by jumping forward and back in the same browser window. Or two separate windows. Thank you.)
Non podes atopar unha película ou serie? Inicia sesión para creala.
Queres valorar ou engadir o elemento a unha listaxe?
Non es membro?
Resposta de Jim Stark
no 21 de setembro do 2023 ás 8:06AM
I'm curious what's the official position, but as a regular user, I'd prefer the loss of an absolutely insignificant 12 pixels on each side in favor of having the standard maximum of 2000x3000. As the alternative, allow the max of 2025x3000, it's a very common proportion.
Resposta de Giger
no 21 de setembro do 2023 ás 9:07AM
I'm (of course) curious, as well. I tend to prefer the version with “more grass and leaves”, but I suspect I'm not in the majority with that preference. At least as a regular user/maybe-default image size goes. 2025x3000 seems like a viable alternative resolution.