Discuss The Wolf of Snow Hollow
Discuss → Movies → The Wolf of Snow Hollow → General
Hmmm not what I expected. SPOILERS
posted by OddRobSTAFFMOD on October 15, 2020 at 4:54 AM
Dosent mean its a bad thing either. Apparently the actor/director/writer is known for films like this. Dark drama comedy. It seems like it was shot and edited in a rush. Some of the scenes get played out of order, which Im guessing was a 'artistic' pick. But it thru me off while watching. Acting was great, little over the top from Cummings but still was able to pull off feeling sorry for him. But I can see how some viewers might find him off putting. The only thing that was missing was boobs and ass. No horror film is complete without it IMO. And they had some good opportunities but didnt....im looking at you Chloe East!
SPOILERSSo the killer was the guy that rented out the house in the start, I had to rewind back to double check. I also think they had him at the station. My question is why didnt they notice that hes like fucking 6'6" at the station during the interviews? It makes sense that the couple didnt find any knifes in the house and that he left a print out showing them where the hot water turn on was to lure the guy out so he can kill the girl in the house or vice versa. I dont get why the boyfriend had one of his sewing needles at the end, did he accidentally take it? And I also dont understand if it was the taxidermist how the hell did he have super strength to rip an arm off?! And how did he bite the girls so hard with a wolf mask on?? And fold the one cop in half? The deer on the road missing some skin makes sense since he might have actually put his bloody hand print on it and couldnt clean it off so he just cut it off like that one officer says. If you go back you can piece things together and see where they are leading but I just cant shake the super strength thing! I also dont understand what the meth head had to do with anything besides being a fake lead. Who was the guy he killed/burned in his yard? Someone needs to watch this so I can talk about it!
Reply by bratface
on October 15, 2020 at 4:20 PM
Hey guys, she's barely out of the 'schoolroom'. Weren't there other women in the movie you could objectify?
Reply by OddRob
on October 15, 2020 at 11:15 PM
Shes a 19 year old actress in Hollywood, Im pretty sure producers are doing alot more than objectifying her right now.
Reply by bratface
on October 16, 2020 at 2:42 AM
This is from Rob's OP:
The only thing that was missing was boobs and ass. No horror film is complete without it IMO. And they had some good opportunities but didnt....im looking at you Chloe East!
And you appear to be agreeing with him. I said that mainly because of how old she looks in her 'profile' picture used for the movie. I was surprised she was 19 but I still stand by the 'barely out of the schoolroom' statement.
Also, Mech, you can't deny that a good part of your posts are about wanting certain actresses to get naked.
Reply by OddRob
on October 16, 2020 at 2:52 AM
I stand by that quote sir. I believe certain horror films need some T&A to even be considered horror films. Of course not all do. And I agree she looks young, but not Brooke Shields naked at 12 young! Jesus even I have a heart and a cut off point...Hollywood dosent apparently.
Reply by bratface
on October 16, 2020 at 2:26 PM
Look at her profile pic for the movie on this website, she looks like a 12-year-old. I just looked at the link you included & yikes she looks even younger in those images.