讨论 破綻

While the ending nicely wrapped everything up, for me I wasn't buying it. To imagine his character made such a glaring oversight after so much control, manipulation and intelligence seemed so unlikely as to be bizarre. I had missed this film when it first came out, and it held up well, but for me this was one spot where it didn't really work. Still, a really great film!

6 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

But, the movie is called Francture... he spoke at length about finding hairline fractures in eggs that no one else saw... yet he himself missed the fracture in himself, that is the story!

Again (and I'll ignore the spelling mistake :), I just don't buy that someone would be so precise and miss something so obvious. I know it is the point of the film/story, but it's not a point that fits it's own narrative IMO.

They needed a feel good ending where the evildoers get punished... BUT i still think it worked as he was so blinded by revenge that he missed this subtle point...

Also, he had no way of knowing that the officer would have killed himself and his gun entered into evidence/storage...

@Daddie0 said:

(and I'll ignore the spelling mistake :)

Thank you, that's all it was, promise! Not like I confused who/whom, or its/it's, or amount/number, or foisted a "should of" upon anyone :-)

@Renovatio said:

They needed a feel good ending where the evildoers get punished...

This is how it felt to me, but your second point is a good one. I guess part of the appeal of a film like this is that we--the audience--become so enamored with the skill of the antagonist that we end up rooting for him/her, twisted as that may be. And in the end, anything that doesn't fully satisfy both our built up expectations _and _the need to resolve the film in a "moral" way feels cheap and convoluted. Maybe it's just me, but I almost always prefer the former to the latter, unless the latter is done with precision.

@Renovatio said:

Also, he had no way of knowing that the officer would have killed himself and his gun entered into evidence/storage...

That is true. But, it's almost (not quite, but almost) irrelevant because, the cop killing himself notwithstanding, a new trial would not have been possible if he'd left his wife on life support indefinitely.

It was his action of pulling the plug that changed her condition and thus changed the status of the case. New evidence on the resolved case of attempted murder is one thing; but the new evidence has teeth because a new charge was available.

And, once again, it's his character flaw, his fracture, that made all the difference.

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区