بحث شکست

While the ending nicely wrapped everything up, for me I wasn't buying it. To imagine his character made such a glaring oversight after so much control, manipulation and intelligence seemed so unlikely as to be bizarre. I had missed this film when it first came out, and it held up well, but for me this was one spot where it didn't really work. Still, a really great film!

6 پاسخ (در صفحه 1 از 1)

Jump to last post

But, the movie is called Francture... he spoke at length about finding hairline fractures in eggs that no one else saw... yet he himself missed the fracture in himself, that is the story!

Again (and I'll ignore the spelling mistake :), I just don't buy that someone would be so precise and miss something so obvious. I know it is the point of the film/story, but it's not a point that fits it's own narrative IMO.

They needed a feel good ending where the evildoers get punished... BUT i still think it worked as he was so blinded by revenge that he missed this subtle point...

Also, he had no way of knowing that the officer would have killed himself and his gun entered into evidence/storage...

@Daddie0 said:

(and I'll ignore the spelling mistake :)

Thank you, that's all it was, promise! Not like I confused who/whom, or its/it's, or amount/number, or foisted a "should of" upon anyone :-)

@Renovatio said:

They needed a feel good ending where the evildoers get punished...

This is how it felt to me, but your second point is a good one. I guess part of the appeal of a film like this is that we--the audience--become so enamored with the skill of the antagonist that we end up rooting for him/her, twisted as that may be. And in the end, anything that doesn't fully satisfy both our built up expectations _and _the need to resolve the film in a "moral" way feels cheap and convoluted. Maybe it's just me, but I almost always prefer the former to the latter, unless the latter is done with precision.

@Renovatio said:

Also, he had no way of knowing that the officer would have killed himself and his gun entered into evidence/storage...

That is true. But, it's almost (not quite, but almost) irrelevant because, the cop killing himself notwithstanding, a new trial would not have been possible if he'd left his wife on life support indefinitely.

It was his action of pulling the plug that changed her condition and thus changed the status of the case. New evidence on the resolved case of attempted murder is one thing; but the new evidence has teeth because a new charge was available.

And, once again, it's his character flaw, his fracture, that made all the difference.

فیلم و نمایش تلویزیونی را نمی‌توانید پیدا کنید؟ به سیستم وارد شوید تا آن را ایجاد کنید.

Global

s تمرکز بر منوی جستجو
p منوی پروفایل باز شود
esc بستن پنجره باز
? پنجره میانبرهای صفحه‌کلید باز شود

در صفحات مدیا

b بازگشت به عقب (یا در صورت لزوم به منشا)
e برو به صفحه ویرایش

در صفحات فصل تلویزیونی

(فلش سمت راست) برو به فصل بعد
(پیکان سمت چپ) برو به نشست قبلی

در صفحات قسمت تلویزیونی

(فلش سمت راست) برو به قسمت بعد
(پیکان سمت چپ) برو به قسمت قبلی

در تمام صفحات تصویر

a پنجره افزودن تصویر باز شود

در تمام صفحات ویرایش

t انتخابگر ترجمه باز شود
ctrl+ s ثبت از

در صفحات بحث

n ایجاد بحث جدید
w تغییر وضعیت وضعیت تماشا
p تغییر وضعیت عمومی/خصوصی
c تغییر وضعیت بسته/باز
a گشایش صفحه فعالیت
r پاسخ به بحث
l برو به آخرین پاسخ
ctrl+ enter پیام خود را ثبت کنید
(فلش سمت راست) صفحه بعد
(پیکان سمت چپ) صفحه قبلی

تنظیمات

آیا می‌خواهید به این مورد امتیاز دهید یا به فهرست اضافه کنید؟

ورود