the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!
Não consegue encontrar um certo Filme ou Série? Inicie Sessão e adicione-o.
Resposta de tmdb53400018
em 24 junho 2017 às 5:43 PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Resposta de BarkingBaphomet
em 24 junho 2017 às 8:33 PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Resposta de tmdb53400018
em 24 junho 2017 às 8:52 PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Resposta de tmdb43737777
em 24 junho 2017 às 9:24 PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Resposta de BarkingBaphomet
em 24 junho 2017 às 9:38 PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Resposta de tmdb53400018
em 24 junho 2017 às 10:26 PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Resposta de Irina
em 7 novembro 2017 às 1:14 PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Resposta de jorgito2001
em 18 abril 2019 às 9:45 AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!