the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!
Не можете найти фильм или сериал? Войдите на сайт, чтобы добавить его.
Ответ от tmdb53400018
, 24 июня 2017 в 17:43
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Ответ от BarkingBaphomet
, 24 июня 2017 в 20:33
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ответ от tmdb53400018
, 24 июня 2017 в 20:52
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Ответ от tmdb43737777
, 24 июня 2017 в 21:24
Nope. The original is a classic
Ответ от BarkingBaphomet
, 24 июня 2017 в 21:38
i thought he was referring to this.
Ответ от tmdb53400018
, 24 июня 2017 в 22:26
Of course! How could I forget ?
Ответ от Irina
, 7 ноября 2017 в 13:14
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Ответ от jorgito2001
, 18 апреля 2019 в 09:45
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!