the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!
Negalite rasti filmo ar TV laidos? Prisijunkite, kad sukurtumėte.
Atsakė tmdb53400018
2017 birželio 24, 5:43 PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Atsakė BarkingBaphomet
2017 birželio 24, 8:33 PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Atsakė tmdb53400018
2017 birželio 24, 8:52 PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Atsakė tmdb43737777
2017 birželio 24, 9:24 PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Atsakė BarkingBaphomet
2017 birželio 24, 9:38 PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Atsakė tmdb53400018
2017 birželio 24, 10:26 PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Atsakė Irina
2017 lapkričio 7, 1:14 PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Atsakė jorgito2001
2019 balandžio 18, 9:45 AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!