Apspriediet The Thing
Apspriest → Filmas → The Thing → Vispārējs
Better than the original?
posted by tmdb82469342STAFFMOD on jūnijs 24, 2017 at 11:06 AM
Of course it isn't.
Of course it isn't.
Vai nevarat atrast filmu vai TV pārraidi? Piesakieties, lai to izveidotu.
Vai vēlaties novērtēt vai uzskaitīt šo vienumu?
Vai neesat biedrs?
Atbildēt no tmdb53400018
on jūnijs 24, 2017 at 5:43 PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Atbildēt no BarkingBaphomet
on jūnijs 24, 2017 at 8:33 PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Atbildēt no tmdb53400018
on jūnijs 24, 2017 at 8:52 PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Atbildēt no tmdb43737777
on jūnijs 24, 2017 at 9:24 PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Atbildēt no BarkingBaphomet
on jūnijs 24, 2017 at 9:38 PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Atbildēt no tmdb53400018
on jūnijs 24, 2017 at 10:26 PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Atbildēt no Irina
on novembris 7, 2017 at 1:14 PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Atbildēt no jorgito2001
on aprīlis 18, 2019 at 9:45 AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!