Discuție The Thing
Discuție → Filme artistice → The Thing → Generale
Better than the original?
postat de către tmdb82469342STAFFMOD pe data de 24 iunie 2017 la ora 11:06AM
Of course it isn't.
Răspuns de tmdb53400018
pe data de 24 iunie 2017 la ora 5:43PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Răspuns de BarkingBaphomet
pe data de 24 iunie 2017 la ora 8:33PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Răspuns de tmdb53400018
pe data de 24 iunie 2017 la ora 8:52PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Răspuns de tmdb43737777
pe data de 24 iunie 2017 la ora 9:24PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Răspuns de BarkingBaphomet
pe data de 24 iunie 2017 la ora 9:38PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Răspuns de tmdb53400018
pe data de 24 iunie 2017 la ora 10:26PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Răspuns de Irina
pe data de 7 noiembrie 2017 la ora 1:14PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Răspuns de jorgito2001
pe data de 18 aprilie 2019 la ora 9:45AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!