Дискутиране на The Thing
Дискутиране → Филми → The Thing → Общи
Better than the original?
публикувана от tmdb82469342STAFFMOD на 24 юни 2017 в 11:06 AM
Of course it isn't.
Of course it isn't.
Не можете да откриете филм или сериал? Влезте, за да го създадете.
Искате ли да го оцените или добавите към списък?
Нямате профил?
Отговор от tmdb53400018
на 24 юни 2017 в 5:43 PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Отговор от BarkingBaphomet
на 24 юни 2017 в 8:33 PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Отговор от tmdb53400018
на 24 юни 2017 в 8:52 PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Отговор от tmdb43737777
на 24 юни 2017 в 9:24 PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Отговор от BarkingBaphomet
на 24 юни 2017 в 9:38 PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Отговор от tmdb53400018
на 24 юни 2017 в 10:26 PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Отговор от Irina
на 7 ноември 2017 в 1:14 PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Отговор от jorgito2001
на 18 април 2019 в 9:45 AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!