the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!
Non riesci a trovare un film o una serie Tv? Accedi per crearlo.
Risposta da tmdb53400018
il 24 giugno, 2017 alle 5:43PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Risposta da BarkingBaphomet
il 24 giugno, 2017 alle 8:33PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Risposta da tmdb53400018
il 24 giugno, 2017 alle 8:52PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Risposta da tmdb43737777
il 24 giugno, 2017 alle 9:24PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Risposta da BarkingBaphomet
il 24 giugno, 2017 alle 9:38PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Risposta da tmdb53400018
il 24 giugno, 2017 alle 10:26PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Risposta da Irina
il 7 novembre, 2017 alle 1:14PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Risposta da jorgito2001
il 18 aprile, 2019 alle 9:45AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!