Debate The Thing
Discutir → Películas → The Thing → General
Better than the original?
publicado por tmdb82469342STAFFMOD el 24 de junio de 2017 a las 11:06
Of course it isn't.
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 24 de junio de 2017 a las 17:43
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Contestado por BarkingBaphomet
el 24 de junio de 2017 a las 20:33
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 24 de junio de 2017 a las 20:52
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Contestado por tmdb43737777
el 24 de junio de 2017 a las 21:24
Nope. The original is a classic
Contestado por BarkingBaphomet
el 24 de junio de 2017 a las 21:38
i thought he was referring to this.
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 24 de junio de 2017 a las 22:26
Of course! How could I forget ?
Contestado por Irina
el 7 de noviembre de 2017 a las 13:14
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Contestado por jorgito2001
el 18 de abril de 2019 a las 09:45
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!