the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!
Nemôžeš nájsť film alebo seriál? Prihlás sa a pridaj ho.
Odpoveď od tmdb53400018
dňa 24. jún, 2017 o 5:43PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Odpoveď od BarkingBaphomet
dňa 24. jún, 2017 o 8:33PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Odpoveď od tmdb53400018
dňa 24. jún, 2017 o 8:52PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Odpoveď od tmdb43737777
dňa 24. jún, 2017 o 9:24PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Odpoveď od BarkingBaphomet
dňa 24. jún, 2017 o 9:38PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Odpoveď od tmdb53400018
dňa 24. jún, 2017 o 10:26PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Odpoveď od Irina
dňa 7. november, 2017 o 1:14PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Odpoveď od jorgito2001
dňa 18. apríl, 2019 o 9:45AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!