the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!
Etkö löydä elokuvaa tai TV-ohjelmaa? Kirjaudu sisään lisätäksesi se.
Vastaus käyttäjältä tmdb53400018
24 kesäkuu 2017 klo 5:43PM
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Vastaus käyttäjältä BarkingBaphomet
24 kesäkuu 2017 klo 8:33PM
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Vastaus käyttäjältä tmdb53400018
24 kesäkuu 2017 klo 8:52PM
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Vastaus käyttäjältä tmdb43737777
24 kesäkuu 2017 klo 9:24PM
Nope. The original is a classic
Vastaus käyttäjältä BarkingBaphomet
24 kesäkuu 2017 klo 9:38PM
i thought he was referring to this.
Vastaus käyttäjältä tmdb53400018
24 kesäkuu 2017 klo 10:26PM
Of course! How could I forget ?
Vastaus käyttäjältä Irina
7 marraskuu 2017 klo 1:14PM
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Vastaus käyttäjältä jorgito2001
18 huhtikuu 2019 klo 9:45AM
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!