the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!
No trobeu una pel·lícula o una sèrie? Inicieu la sessió per a crear-la.
Resposta per tmdb53400018
el 24 " de 2017 a les 5:43 P.M.
Absolutely not. It's too derivative of Carpenter's take, and the special effects can't hold a candle to his film's.
Resposta per BarkingBaphomet
el 24 " de 2017 a les 8:33 P.M.
the answer is no, whichever one you meant by the original.
Resposta per tmdb53400018
el 24 " de 2017 a les 8:52 P.M.
Ahem, one can only assume that the original poster is referring to John Carpenter's "original" film, as he has the 2011 The Thing as the topic of discussion -- and Howard Hawks' film is a different animal.
Resposta per tmdb43737777
el 24 " de 2017 a les 9:24 P.M.
Nope. The original is a classic
Resposta per BarkingBaphomet
el 24 " de 2017 a les 9:38 P.M.
i thought he was referring to this.
Resposta per tmdb53400018
el 24 " de 2017 a les 10:26 P.M.
Of course! How could I forget ?
Resposta per Irina
el 7 r de 2017 a les 1:14 P.M.
Both "The Thing From Another World" (1951) and its brilliant REMAKE "The Thing" (1982) are 100x better than this one
Resposta per jorgito2001
el 18 , de 2019 a les 9:45 A.M.
Sadly, there was a LOT of studio interference. This video explains some things HERE. There was to be A LOT of practical FX. The 2011 movie SHOULD'VE been better! Damn shame!