Discuss Shazam! Fury of the Gods
Discuss → Movies → Shazam! Fury of the Gods → General
It's better than Bland Adam at least
posted by aholejonesSTAFFMOD on April 10, 2023 at 6:19 AM
But you know that's not saying much. Speaking of Bland Ad......ZZZZZZZZZZZZ....sorry I fell asleep for a minute just thinking about that movie....now where was I....yes Bland Adam...they made such a poor movie and the Rock gave such a crappy performance as Bland Adam they didn't even bother inviting him for a cameo even though isn't he this Shazam guy's nemesis or something. Anyways this is sequel is something of a downgrade when compared to the first one. Now don't get me wrong the first one wasn't great, but DC/WB has been putting so many crappy superhero movies even something slightly better than average starts to look better than it really is. This one however is just average. Just another one of those dime a dozen superhero movies you will most likely very quickly forget about after watching it. Now I don't want to be all negative so I would like to point out that for whatever reason they decreased the size of the fake muscles of Shazam and apparently transferred all of that volume directly to that Mary character's chest area. Now I'm not complaining, but seems like a strange thing to change.
Reply by D-magic
on April 14, 2023 at 1:50 PM
The movie sucks, so increasing the chest area seems like a good cover for that. But at least DC are trying different genres and approaches, from serious and dark to goofy and childish. And I know that they tried vaguely to connect this to Greek mythology and stuff, but that deux ex machina solution with Wonder Woman is something that was already ridiculed and laughed at even back in ancient Greece theater.
Reply by The Hydracubus
on June 4, 2023 at 9:15 PM
Glad to know I'm not the only person who enjoyed the film because of the Grace's chest area.