Дискутиране на Пропадане в мрака

From making Khan a pasty English guy to the stupid Spock screaming Khan to using his blood on a tribble what the hell what a stupid mess!

4 отговора (на страница 1 от общо 1)

Jump to last post

Seems I missed a bit when I dozed off! I'm surprised there was no campaign of outrage at a guy called Khan being played by said "pasty English guy".

@mcse2000ca said:

From making Khan a pasty English guy to the stupid Spock screaming Khan to using his blood on a tribble what the hell what a stupid mess!

I guess in the original series it made sense for a Mexican actor to play Khan?

Remaking one of the best Trek films was a sore mistake, right from the off. There just wasn't any way that taking something as incredible a Wrath of Khan, and turning it into some derivative new-age popcorn action flick, was going to turn out well. I imagine that's why Ambrams hid the fact that the bad guy was Khan, and flat-out lied when people asked him if that's the way he was going with it. He probably knew that nobody really wanted a remake of an already-great film, so he figured if he just billed it as something original, and slopped some post-modern shit over it, maybe it would go better. But it's rated 74 here and 7.7 on IMDB, and made more than double its production budget, so that gives one the general idea of what the movie-going audience will accept and pay for, and thereby what will continue to be made.

@Ellison Havelock said:

Remaking one of the best Trek films was a sore mistake, right from the off. There just wasn't any way that taking something as incredible a Wrath of Khan, and turning it into some derivative new-age popcorn action flick, was going to turn out well. I imagine that's why Ambrams hid the fact that the bad guy was Khan, and flat-out lied when people asked him if that's the way he was going with it. He probably knew that nobody really wanted a remake of an already-great film, so he figured if he just billed it as something original, and slopped some post-modern shit over it, maybe it would go better. But it's rated 74 here and 7.7 on IMDB, and made more than double its production budget, so that gives one the general idea of what the movie-going audience will accept and pay for, and thereby what will continue to be made.

Yup. I imagine Mr Roddenberry would be spinning in his grave at what his universe is becoming.

Не можете да откриете филм или сериал? Влезте, за да го създадете.

Глобални

s фокусиране на лентата за търсене
p отваряне на меню "Профил"
esc затваряне на отворен прозорец
? отваряне на прозореца за клавишните комбинации

На страниците за медиите

b връщане назад
e към страницата за редактиране

На страниците за сезони

(стрелка надясно) към следващ сезон
(стрелка наляво) към предишния сезон

На страниците за епизоди

(стрелка надясно) към следващ епизод
(стрелка наляво) предишен епизод

На всички страници за изображения

a отваряне на прозорец за добавяне на изображение

На всички страници за редактиране

t меню за избор на език, на превода
ctrl+ s изпращане на форма

На страниците за дискусия

n създаване на нова дискусия
w статус на наблюдаване
p публична/лична
c затваряне/отваряне
a отваряне на действия
r отговаряне в дискусия
l към последния отговор
ctrl+ enter изпращане на вашето съобщение
(стрелка надясно) следваща страница
(стрелка наляво) предишна страница

Настройки

Искате ли да го оцените или добавите към списък?

Вход