Discusión Psycho
Discutir → Películas → Psycho → General
The monologue ending
publicado por tmdb43737777STAFFMOD el 17 de agosto de 2017 a las 01:16
I know they want to inform the viewer of what is wrong with Norman. Instead of dropping hints throughout, they kept it a surprise until Nation's sister finds Mrs. Bates, but it drones on and on. It really ruins the pace, takes away the shock value and mystery. I think revealing Norman as his mother worked well enough and the explanation wasn't needed
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 17 de agosto de 2017 a las 07:20
I feel you, but at the same time, the detail that the psychiatrist provided was appreciated.
Contestado por RainingBullets
el 18 de agosto de 2017 a las 03:26
I like that the doctor explains about Norman, his true past and outlining how he believes it connects to his behavior in the present (although it's not exactly realistic but I appreciate the effort), however he was a bit long-winded. I re-watched Psycho recently and by the time he was done, it was like the viewer had been hit over the head with it. He really does drone on, it would've been better had it been more concise.
Contestado por somesunnyday
el 18 de agosto de 2017 a las 03:30
Yeah it does go on but back then I don't think average Joe's knowledge on serial killers and psychos was as advanced as it is today.
Contestado por tmdb43737777
el 18 de agosto de 2017 a las 03:57
Good point. The time period.
Contestado por genplant29
el 28 de agosto de 2019 a las 17:17
The monologue ending's never detracted any from the film, for me. It's a little awkward seeming, but still feels like it "works".
Contestado por Tresix
el 9 de marzo de 2024 a las 22:32
I had no problem with the explanation. But that’s just me.