讨论 Graži diena kaimynystėje

'It's not really about Mr Rogers. It's so you. It's good.'

Yes, yes, and no it isn't.

The core story about the journalist might have made a passable daytime TV movie 30 years ago, but is an incredible waste here. There really was a missed opportunity to tell a story about Mr Rogers; an interesting and unusual man with an equally interesting story. And even when we do get Rogers in the frame, the storytelling is so immersed in artificiality, both conceptual and literal, it wallows in its own contrivances.

Advertising standards in many countries now prevent depictions of grown men as incompetent around the house or as overgrown children. That there is a (probably unintentional) irony in this movie given the framing, doesn't make modern depictions of grown men as emotionally stunted any less objectionable than having women in bikinis straddled over cars. Sure these things exist in real life. But we are also able to call them out as unnecessary perpetuations of clumsy stereotypes too.

I'm sick to death of seeing movie depictions of grown men struggling with daddy issues. By all means make or watch those movies if that is your bag, but ffs don't wrap it inside something else to trick us into buying it.

3 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

I did feel cheated when I realized it was about the writer much more than Fred. It was based on a magazine story that was like that after all. The style didnt bother me but it did stand out as a gimmick to distract me from the lame story. I do think that a lot of men relate to this stuff. Still a yuppie magazine writer with daddy issues annoyed me too. However I found it pleasant enough.

Check out this documentary made earlier for a better take on Rogers life.

Won't you be my Neighbor - 2016

@znexyish Good of you to mention the documentary, which I will try to watch soon. Not being from North America I was only passingly familiar with Rogers, most likely from media reports when he died. So I did read a little about him before watching this movie.

I know nothing about Fred, but I thought the film was largely about him in identifying that some adults as well as just kids need to maybe take a moment and think about things. The journalist was just a schmuck who would have remained unhappy if Fred hadn't persevered with him. He could have been anyone whereas Fred was the driver behind the story.

I agree that modern US films completely overdo the whole 'men and women would find life so much more rewarding if only they reconciled with an inadequate parent they haven't had anything to do with for decades' angle. I imagine the vast majority of adults who arent particularly close to one parent live their life in a way that is completely unaffected by that fact. Many primates grow up to routinely not have a close relationship with both parents in adulthood so it always strikes me as a bit bizarre that films keep pushing this angle.

6/10

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区