Discuss Where Is The Friend's House?

Item: Where Is My Friend's House?

Language: en-US

Type of Problem: Incorrect_content

Extra Details: This film should be added to a collection with Life, and Nothing More (1992) & Through the Olive Trees (1994) (https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/83761 and https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/47104-zire-darakhatan-zeyton). The three films make up the Koker Trilogy and are all interconnected (the 1992 film is about this film and the 1994 is about the 1992 film). Is there a way to do this? Thanks!

5 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

Please provide proof they are all sequels rather than simply films set in the same universe.

How would one prove that? I don’t see why they aren’t considered a collection just because it has an unorthodox style. They’re are recurring characters and reconstructions of each previous film. These films are a trilogy.

 There are films grouped as collections already on TMDb that are not "sequels,"

Please report them (Overview -> Report)

A collection shouldn’t be based on whether they are sequels or not, but the Koker trilogy definitely qualifies as sequels. Anyone who has seen the movies would agree. The definition of a sequel is as follows: “a published, broadcast, or recorded work that continues the story or develops the theme of an earlier one.” Or “something that takes place after or as a result of an earlier event.” The first movie is about a young boy trying to find his friends house. The second movie is about the director of that movie (not the real director, the real director (Abbas Kiarostami) directed all of the Koker movies) visiting Koker after a devastating earthquake. He looks for the boy just as the boy looked for his friends house; meeting new people and having a grand adventure. I would say that counts as developing themes. The third movie is about a specific shot from the second movie and how long it took to get it. This movie casts a new director to play Kiarostami and tells us that the second movie was just as “fake” as the first. These movies would make zero sense without knowing the background behind the others. They have repeating characters, scene callbacks, and the same setting. They all deal with human connection, Camaraderie, authority, and some sense of meta. If you haven’t watched these films I highly suggest you do, and if you have I would love to hear why they aren’t sequels.

Yes, I second this! These three movies better fit the definition of a collection (recurring characters for a start) than some groupings on here like the Three Colours or the Ang Lee collections (which I don't want to see gone, I just want the Koker trilogy to get Collection recognition).

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login