저지 드레드 토론

Dredd, a new adaptation of a character/story we first saw on screen with action star Sylvester Stallone, came out in 2012. And it did not do as well as Stallone's Judge Dredd.

Total Recall 2012 was also an adaptation of a character/story we first saw on screen with action star Arnold Schwarzenegger. And it did not do as well as Arnie's.

Seems 2012 was the year for the grittier darker adaptations of campy shlock.

Both these adaptations stand-alone very well...but, once people get in their minds the "first" one, the campy ones, it makes it difficult to let that go and see the character and the story afresh.

My question is...if the grittier interpretations hit the theatres first, would we also embrace or prefer the campy remakes, or would we dismiss the campy remakes as parodies, too unserious to be worthy?

3 댓글 (1 / 1)

Jump to last post

I never thought the first Dredd was that bad. It had quite a lot of 2000AD in there if you knew where to look. It made two big mistakes, though.

  1. Dredd took his helmet off
  2. The "Dredd having to fight the system he had spent his life upholding" was a "Part 3" storyline, not one for the first part of a Dredd franchise.

The Karl Urban version was well made, but just didn't grab me.

Arnie's "Total Recall" was fun, but the other was forgettable.

I think that if the grittier versions had come first my thoughts would have been much the same.

@DRDMovieMusings said:

Dredd, a new adaptation of a character/story we first saw on screen with action star Sylvester Stallone, came out in 2012. And it did not do as well as Stallone's Judge Dredd.

Total Recall 2012 was also an adaptation of a character/story we first saw on screen with action star Arnold Schwarzenegger. And it did not do as well as Arnie's.

Seems 2012 was the year for the grittier darker adaptations of campy shlock.

Both these adaptations stand-alone very well...but, once people get in their minds the "first" one, the campy ones, it makes it difficult to let that go and see the character and the story afresh.

My question is...if the grittier interpretations hit the theatres first, would we also embrace or prefer the campy remakes, or would we dismiss the campy remakes as parodies, too unserious to be worthy?

Yeah, better as their own thing but shit when compared to their originals.

That's a good point that it's very hard to rewrite a camp classic. Could someone do a dark gritty version of 1980's Flash Gordon? Never.

Maybe the 2010s scifi writers were emboldened by the 1 success that comes to mind, the 2004 dark reinvention of Battlestar Galactica. I was a fan of the original and swore I'd never abandon ship, but dang it, the new one nailed it perfectly. That series actually made me rethink my entire stance on reboots & remakes.

So I'd say it's possible, but NOT easy.

Can you hit it from the other direction, remaking a serious classic as camp? Much easier I think. When done right, comedy breaks all barriers. And just by nature, almost every serious story is begging for a satire. I mean... 2 words... Young Frankenstein!

찾으시는 영화나 TV 프로그램이 없나요? 로그인 하셔서 직접 만들어주세요.

전체

s 검색 바 띄우기
p 프로필 메뉴 열기
esc 열린 창 닫기
? 키보드 단축키 창 열기

미디어 페이지

b 돌아가기
e 편집 페이지로 이동

TV 시즌 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 시즌으로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 시즌으로 가기

TV 에피소드 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 에피소드로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 에피소드로 가기

모든 이미지 페이지

a 이미지 추가 창 열기

모든 편집 페이지

t 번역 선택 열기
ctrl+ s 항목 저장

토론 페이지

n 새 토론 만들기
w 보기 상태
p 공개/비공개 전환
c 열기/닫기 전환
a 활동 열기
r 댓글에 글쓰기
l 마지막 댓글로 가기
ctrl+ enter 회원님의 메세지 제출
(우 화살표) 다음 페이지
(좌 화살표) 이전 페이지

설정

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

로그인