Should'nt these three movies be added in a collection (unbreakable, split and glass). Something like "Shyamalans collection", much like "Robert Langdons Collection". Or just "Unbreakable collection" or something similar.
Не вдалося знайти фільм або серіал? Увійдіть, щоб додати.
Хочете поставити оцінку чи додати до списку?
Немає акаунту?
Відповідь від nmbrg
за 19 січня 2019, 7:30 ВЕЧОРА
What was the reason for deleting the collection?
Відповідь від JabberMoxie
за 8 лютого 2019, 7:46 ВЕЧОРА
I second the idea of a collection. And if the director called it the “Eastrail 177” Trilogy, then so be it. I couldn’t understand, after organizing the first two films into a collection folder, why Kodi failed to see it.
Someone with the ability to do so, please add this (and lock it to prevent deletion).
Відповідь від RodimusConvoy
за 9 лютого 2019, 9:25 РАНКУ
It probably will once it comes out on DVD/Blu-Ray.
Відповідь від JabberMoxie
за 12 лютого 2019, 2:27 РАНКУ
We’re talking about marking the three separate films as part of a collection on this site, for the purposes of scraping utilities and general organization. We’re not talking about a sales bundle or anything like that.
Movies marked as part of a named collection on themoviedb.org have a “Part of the _________ collection” banner.
Відповідь від RodimusConvoy
за 12 лютого 2019, 3:28 РАНКУ
Well there are mods you can talk to if you feel it should be this way. Though I suspect it has to do with the fact the film is still in theaters and they'd make such a change once the dust settles, ie it comes to home media. But, again, I'd contact a mod and see what they say.
Відповідь від tmdb24407783
за 14 лютого 2019, 9:14 РАНКУ
I haven't watched any of these films and know nothing of them but I think here is the issue addressed about six months ago by several mods: https://www.themoviedb.org/talk/5b54db31c3a3685c91004884. It sounds like they somewhat came to an agreement that the three films do not belong together in a collection, or that they shouldn't be put in a collection yet, OR that they should be put into a completely different feature, called universe, which that has yet to be implemented into this website (though I believe Travis plans to have it on the website "late 2019"; from what I remember reading).
I would reccommend reading this: https://www.themoviedb.org/bible/collection and if you think these three do belong in a collection, making a report on this entry or make a post in the support forums or Re Open that thread and make a new reply, stating why you think they should be in a collection. (Or, you can just do any of those three without reading that thing I linked or without giving any reasons, haha your life; your choices ).
Відповідь від JabberMoxie
за 26 лютого 2019, 7:15 РАНКУ
Okay, so it may be a collection “after the fact,” but so what? If a filmmaker explicitly wants to group his/her films in a collection, and promotes them as such, I kinda feel like the web info should match that. Otherwise, we’re back to posters full of Roman numerals.
I like the “universe” idea, though I think it might be unwise to start splitting hairs for something that is mostly just for automatic scraping and organization.
Already, issues have come up with films like the recent Ghostbusters reboot with regard to collection status. Deciding these things will seem almost arbitrary. With franchises being such film juggernauts, it just seems like it will make more work and headaches for mods (and scraping app creators). Won’t be long before they start putting films in sub-collection folders of a larger universe collection folder.
My sympathies lie with all site mods responsible for maintaining any info that begins with the word “Star”.
Відповідь від tmdb24407783
за 26 лютого 2019, 12:41 ВЕЧОРА
Btw, I'm not sure if any mod will see this discussion because it's under general rather than being a report or a support topic. If you really want to hear what the mods say and want this change to happen I would recommend making a post in the support forums, making a content report in this entry (or on any of the other related films' entries), or replying to that report thread I linked.
Відповідь від jeffshead
за 2 квітня 2019, 6:36 ВЕЧОРА
I vote for a collection. I bet there would be way more yays then nays if a poll was posted.
It's listed as a trilogy/series here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbreakable_(film_series)
Відповідь від thedieher
за 5 травня 2019, 1:59 РАНКУ
i was looking fro the same thing... if you look at the tmdb page of unbreakable in the conversation section someone ask why they didnt in a collection and one mod answer this : "Hi, unfortunately the last movie is a sequel to both the first and the second, while the second is not a proper sequel to the first movie, meaning this is not a fit for our current collection rules. We have to be patient and wait for universe style collections. Thanks."
so i did a google research and i found this : https://www.themoviedb.org/bible/collection
But i still think its a big mistake not to link these films together.
Відповідь від apo86
за 11 травня 2019, 6:02 ВЕЧОРА
That explanation makes no sense. So apparently I should be able to create a movie set of only Split and Glass, because according to the mod quote that's a true sequel? Let's do that then, if only to see what reason the mods come up with to delete it.
Відповідь від jeffshead
за 11 травня 2019, 6:56 ВЕЧОРА
For more nonsensical wisdom, visit this thread: https://www.themoviedb.org/talk/5a049ff79251416afa001372 (You'll have to login since it was removed)
Відповідь від apo86
за 11 травня 2019, 8:11 ВЕЧОРА
I love how that thread is deleted and there was never a response to the points nabsltd brought up, except "we already explained countless of times". Yet I can't find a conclusive argument addressing those points anywhere. I get the feeling this decision was made before Glass was released and now the mods are just doubling down on it for no reason? Seems really weird.
Відповідь від Abejo
за 27 травня 2019, 4:00 ВЕЧОРА
I also think that it should be a collection, since they are the same characters and the 3rd installment directly touches the previous 2, if this film is not a collection it would be necessary to review the collection of 007 since although it is the same character they are not correlative films
Відповідь від BCYHInfo
за 21 листопада 2019, 11:54 РАНКУ
The mod replied but mmm... i am still confused.
https://www.themoviedb.org/talk/5b54fd070e0a2673cd0075c0