讨论 ספיידרמן: רחוק מהבית

https://deadline.com/2019/07/spider-man-far-from-home-crosses-1-billion-worldwide-box-office-sony-marvel-1202653689/

They're 3 for 3 this year!

The only notable difference is Sony gets the money instead of Disney.

7 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

BTW , Marvel only had a 2 picture deal with Sony for Spider-Man, so a joint 3rd film is still up in the air. There was an insider rumor that stated that for Sony to continue partnership with Marvel on Spider-Man: Far from Home would have to break a billion. Looks like at least that's not a factor anymore when Marvel renegotiates their deal with Sony for further films.

If they wanted to Marvel kids just strip Sony of the rights to Spider-Man that would require a huge payment to Sony would probably years bleed 2 years lawsuits but they could do it. The only reason they don't I think is that Sony has been willing to negotiate and not just since the failure of Amazing Spider-Man 2. For The Avengers movie in 2012 Marvel ask for permission the show Oscorp towers in the New York City skyline Sony agreed the scene was cut. as long as Sony is reasonable and willing to negotiate I don't think Marvel will pull the nuclear option.

One of the reasons why they agreed to the partnership with Marvel in the first place was because Sony lost a lot of credibility after they were hacked. Many people in the entertainment industry refused to work with Sony afterwards because they were mentioned scathingly in many of the emails and others didn't like some of Sony's practices that were detailed. Them deciding to work with Disney/Marvel restored a ton of good faith that they had lost because of it. Imagine the backlash Sony would get if they decided to screw with the American biggest movie company after all that.

Sony was hacked in 2014, but as I pointed out, Sony was already willing to negotiate with Marvel as early as 2010-2011, long before the hack, and long before either of the "Amazing Spider-Man' movies was released. Sony has always been on much better terms with Marvel than Fox, which was never even willing to negotiate.

@autoexec.batman said:

Sony was hacked in 2014, but as I pointed out, Sony was already willing to negotiate with Marvel as early as 2010-2011, long before the hack, and long before either of the "Amazing Spider-Man' movies was released. Sony has always been on much better terms with Marvel than Fox, which was never even willing to negotiate.

Sony was never serious about negotiating with Marvel. They actually had other plans for Spider-Man which were brought out by the hack. The hack changed everything around Sony, and Disney/Marvel saw an opportunity they could use.

https://movieweb.com/marvel-spider-man-movie-reboot-sony-hack/

As I already pointed out, in 2011, when the first Avengers movie was in production, Marvel asked Sony for permission to show Oscorp Towers in the New York skyline during the final battle, Sony immediately granted permission. In the end, the scene was cut.

Another example of Sony and Marvel being on good terms would be the second failed Ghost Rider movie. When it was clear that the movie was a failure, Sony simply gave the rights back to Marvel, unlike Fox who refused to even negotiate with Marvel when Marvel offered to extend the rights to Daredevil in exchange for the right to use Galactus and the Silver Surfer in Infinity War. Fox told Marvel to go pound sand and just sat on the Daredevil until they expired.

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区