Lock. Thank you very much.
Delete poster https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/vdBduuarsh2e5QcnIG1k1TQrPSN.jpg

TIP: If you want to force the line break, click Space 2 times and then click Enter. Just Space > Space > Enter.

Question, so this is new SOP?
Every smaller REZ gets deleted?
Mod has a lot of deleting to do!

@DaMan said:

Question, so this is new SOP?
Every smaller REZ gets deleted?
Mod has a lot of deleting to do!

I'm not sure what you are getting at. If someone adds a HQ upgrade we always remove the lower quality original (and if it's the other way around, we remove the lower quality bigger sized image). That's been the same since 2012 at least, and probably all the way back to the start of TMDb. I hope you aren't suggesting that we keep duplicate posters around. That would be a lot of extra images not taken care of.

Yes there are three or more in EN for this release alone!

I'm sure someone will report those duplicates at some point. Or is this your report? Then please give some more information to help us narrow down the duplicate posters. Thanks.

So tmdb is the source for ONLY huge images?
I know I have reported those block busters with like 60-80 images...2 or three sizes.
So only huge ones and only deleted if reported specifically?
Lucky I know how to make an image smaller!
So that means the goal is TMDB will ONLY support 4K?
Thanks

You are not making any sense. But sure, I'll go over this blindly if you don't want to be specific. In this case two identical images were present. One was 2000x3000, the other was 1440x2161. Original mod in this topic deleted the 1440x2161 since the bigger one was good enough for that size. I just don't understand what you think was wrong with that.

Now and then I (or some other moderator) do a general big investigation on images for popular movies such as this one. But it's much easier if we get specific reports from users. This is the way it has always been. It's not a new policy.

There were two dupes in Eng for this movie. I deleted those and also one that was an old placeholder image. Remember that if there is one difference, for example the size of the title text or the location of the title text, it is not a dupe.

Not always. Even when 4k support was added. for the longest time 1000x1500 or 2k was still TMDB preferred.
I even asked about 2k images in the past...
I understand, thanks for clarifying. You can close this.

Yes, there was a very old text about what image sizes we preferred that stuck around for a long time, even after the current policy was in place. Best quality possible is what we want now, but always make sure the image looks good enough at the size it is added. Thanks for communicating. Closing topic.

Sorry to reopen, keep in mind we all are not using 4k system, so that is not obvious to us all! please close.

I think that should not be an issue. A larger image should appear just fine on a non-4k system. Just check how backdrops are used on Letterboxd (at a much smaller size than original). The opposite, however, would be very bad.

I realize that by nature. A 4k image displayed in 2k looks fine because it is resized smaller.
However the same image on 4k might not look as good.