Aaron Eckhart and Radha Mitchell appeared in the previous movies as the president and Leah. Why didn't they reprise their roles?
Etkö löydä elokuvaa tai TV-ohjelmaa? Kirjaudu sisään lisätäksesi se.
Haluatko pisteyttää vai lisätä tämän nimikkeen listaan?
Ei rekisteröitynyt jäsen?
Vastaus käyttäjältä simian_ninja
30 elokuu 2019 klo 12:40AM
Probably because the first one was terrible, I looked it up and couldn't believe that this is the third film in the series. How on Earth was there a sequel, I'll never know.
Vastaus käyttäjältä VHS-VANDAL
30 elokuu 2019 klo 1:00AM
I LIKED BOTH FILMS.THE FIRST BEING THE BEST.
Vastaus käyttäjältä GaryO
1 syyskuu 2019 klo 9:12AM
I enjoyed both films as well. They broke out of the usual Hollywood paradigm of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy.
Vastaus käyttäjältä martymonstertmdb
6 syyskuu 2019 klo 1:08PM
As Aaron Eckhart always says "You either leave a franchise or you stay long enough to see the hero become the villain".
Vastaus käyttäjältä cpheonix
15 marraskuu 2019 klo 7:49PM
Aaron Eckhart wasn't needed as his character was clearly no longer President. But yeah, they could've tried to get Radha Mitchell back.
I also enjoyed this series, particularly the first one. But seems like Nolte and Huston are both typecasted, I'm sure I've seen them in very similar roles before.
Vastaus käyttäjältä VHS-VANDAL
15 marraskuu 2019 klo 8:15PM
NOLTE CAN PLAY THAT ROLE FOR THE REST HIS LIFE AND I WILL BE HAPPY.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Daddie0
11 huhtikuu 2020 klo 12:25AM
I didn't know this was a series. (I asked a question about that here, but then found the answer in another thread.) So I went back and checked to see if I had watched/rated either Olympus or London. Turns out I gave Olympus a 4/10 and hadn't seen London. I gave this one a generous 5/10 as a popcorn flick, but I'm sure I will have forgotten it soon enou...wait, what was I talking about again?
Vastaus käyttäjältä GaryO
29 tammikuu 2022 klo 7:01AM
While I liked this film, I liked the first two a lot better.