Discuss Scream

How was that pulled off so swiftly without Casey seeing anything? Actually, I think she must have seen something because she squirms away for a second before turning on the patio light, but did Stu just run across and slit his guts open and then hide somewhere else, or did it happen another way?

Thoughts?

10 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

I dig it.

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...

Wehoaks knows it to be true.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login