How was that pulled off so swiftly without Casey seeing anything? Actually, I think she must have seen something because she squirms away for a second before turning on the patio light, but did Stu just run across and slit his guts open and then hide somewhere else, or did it happen another way?
Thoughts?
Non podes atopar unha película ou serie? Inicia sesión para creala.
Queres valorar ou engadir o elemento a unha listaxe?
Non es membro?
Resposta de Stratego!
no 21 de febreiro do 2017 ás 4:58PM
Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.
Resposta de Lockard The GOAT
no 28 de febreiro do 2017 ás 12:06AM
Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.
Resposta de littledevil
no 16 de agosto do 2017 ás 8:39PM
three if you see 3.
Resposta de Stratego!
no 16 de agosto do 2017 ás 9:57PM
If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.
Resposta de Cujoseph
no 27 de decembro do 2017 ás 2:50PM
Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.
Resposta de Stratego!
no 27 de decembro do 2017 ás 3:30PM
Quote please.
Resposta de Cujoseph
no 27 de decembro do 2017 ás 4:08PM
It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"
Resposta de littledevil
no 27 de decembro do 2017 ás 10:38PM
I dig it.
Resposta de Stratego!
no 27 de decembro do 2017 ás 11:20PM
Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...
Resposta de Cujoseph
no 27 de decembro do 2017 ás 11:44PM
Wehoaks knows it to be true.