How was that pulled off so swiftly without Casey seeing anything? Actually, I think she must have seen something because she squirms away for a second before turning on the patio light, but did Stu just run across and slit his guts open and then hide somewhere else, or did it happen another way?
Thoughts?
Un film, une émission télévisée ou un artiste est introuvable ? Connectez-vous afin de créer une nouvelle fiche.
Vous souhaitez évaluer ou ajouter cet élément à une liste ?
Pas encore membre ?
Réponse de Stratego!
le 21 février 2017 à 16h58
Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.
Réponse de Lockard The GOAT
le 28 février 2017 à 00h06
Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.
Réponse de littledevil
le 16 août 2017 à 20h39
three if you see 3.
Réponse de Stratego!
le 16 août 2017 à 21h57
If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.
Réponse de Cujoseph
le 27 décembre 2017 à 14h50
Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.
Réponse de Stratego!
le 27 décembre 2017 à 15h30
Quote please.
Réponse de Cujoseph
le 27 décembre 2017 à 16h08
It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"
Réponse de littledevil
le 27 décembre 2017 à 22h38
I dig it.
Réponse de Stratego!
le 27 décembre 2017 à 23h20
Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...
Réponse de Cujoseph
le 27 décembre 2017 à 23h44
Wehoaks knows it to be true.